rolenta
Posted : 4/17/2008 3:07:21 AM
Wow, what an interesting topic! I'm going to have to say that in general, extremists on either end of any issue are usually wrong. The truth can almost always be found in the moderate middle, which is where I stand on this issue. I don't believe that there is a pet underpopulation, in that I don't believe for a second that shelters are scrambling to find pets just so they can line their pockets and perpetuate a myth. That doesn't seem at all reasonable to me. On the other hand, I think AR extremists are also being unreasonable when they point the accusatory finger at breeders and say, "YOU'RE putting dogs in the shelter!"
When I look at the classifieds, I see a tonne of designer dog mixes, usually toy breeds. When I go to the animal shelter, I see heinz 57 large dog mixed breeds who, in all likelihood, were bred completely on accident. I find the breeding of designer dogs and irresponsible breeding to be unethical, but I can't honestly say that I think even they are the cause for most of the dogs in the shelter.
I certainly don't think there's an underpopulation, though. Underpopulation implies that there aren't enough dogs. Well, there are. Anyone who wants a dog can get one, which to me signifies that there certainly is not an underpopulation. I think it's even fair to say that anyone looking for a well-bred puppy with a good temperament and good health can come by one fairly easily.
Also, what's the problem with importing dogs anyway? It doesn't mean that there's no overpopulation, it means that the "underpopulation" is concentrated to certain areas. So what if a shelter imports dogs from somewhere else? Good for them for helping those dogs.
As for overpopulation, I don't think the term is exactly accurate because it implies that there's a problem with the actual number of dogs. There are certainly enough resources to care for the dogs that exist and then some. It isn't a matter of too many dogs, it's a matter of too few people willing to care for those dogs properly - or unwilling to care for those particular dogs which happen to need homes (perhaps they'd rather have the well-bred, well-socialized puppy).
So, what I'm saying is that there is a problem. There are animals in shelters being euthanized, therefore there's a problem. I don't know what the solution is, but I hardly think it's fair to put the responsibility entirely on breeders' shoulders.
Wouldn't it be nice if there were no extremists and all the breeders and shelter workers could just get along and realize that they all care about dogs? There are bad apples in every group of people, but let's not make broad statements about shelter workers being liars and manipulators and breeders being money-hungry jerks who don't care for the welfare of their puppies or dogs as a whole.