Xerxes
Posted : 8/8/2006 10:44:32 PM
Now, either we train dogs as if they are humans, or we train dogs as if they are dogs. They are not going to speak or think as a human. So, we have to understand their basic drives, as well as the natural correction they may receive from momma dog and the rest of the animal world. I imagine most dogs learn after the first time not to mess with a porcupine.
ORIGINAL: ron2
Ron, as always you make good sense. This is why I look forward to your posts. You make your point in a serious manner and then demonstrate it quite colorfully. And you manage to hit the nail on the head.
Case in point: Xerxes was maybe 5 months old when he happened upon a toad. I thought it was a frog so I let him grab it. Well it swelled up into a ball, which is when I realized it wasn't a frog. He dropped it, the toad rolled down the small embankment so he "chased " it and picked it up again, only to spit it out almost immediately.
Needless to say we were both up all night, him vomiting, me consoling and cleaning up. We've seen hundreds of toads since. He's never even sniffed at another toad. Perfect correlation of this action=this consequence. And when I think of it, if I were to have intervened he might have never learned that lesson.
A little slap on the butt is honestly the ONLY thing I don't think is wrong.
I came home from college and was sitting at the dinner table when my nephew (age 2) started throwing his food all over the place. No one said a thing to him. He kept throwing the food. Since he was sitting next to me, I tapped him on the hand and said "We DON'T throw food in this house." That tap on the hand wasn't a slap, it didn't hurt him and he didn't cry. I just directed his attention towards the offending action, yet the tongue lashing I got from his mom (my sister) was pretty severe. "We don't HIT in this house...etc" Well all I can say is that this nephew of mine didn't throw any more food that evening. That was the only time I had to tell him.. The funny thing is that he always listened better to me than to his mom. Probably because I wouldn't tell only tell him what not to do, I'd tell him what to do instead. "Don't go there, stay over here please."
I think the same thing, can apply to dogs, less the tapping. Dogs aren't that good at substituting one behavior for another, that's where we, the owners, come in. Rather than saying "NO" or "DON'T" we need to redirect. "No we don't chew on wires,or destroy pillows Xerxes, how about a nice kong instead?"
I think the substitution of appropriate behaviors does two things: It redirects the dog's energy and makes us happy and it reinforces appropriate behaviors in the minds of our dogs. To tell a dog "No in the house, don't you know how much that white carpet costs?" is ludicrous and all it does is reinforce to us that our dog is "bad" and as has been posted on this thread, make us appear a bit unstable.
I hit Xerxes once. We were in the truck and I was pulled over getting directions from someone. Xerxes was barking up a storm, right in my ear. I slapped him on the thigh and told him to shut up. I felt pretty bad about it because he stopped barking immediately and when I looked back into his eyes I could almost feel the disappointment and loss of trust. To be honest that we the exact moment that I decided that every single bit of training with him would be positive reinforcement. Xerxes wouldn't look at me for 2 days. He didn't sleep in the bed and didn't or wouldn't stay in the same room with me. Could you blame him? The person he trusted and adored the most just hurt him.for doing his job and protecting his truck.
That's why I'm against negative reinforcement. That's why I'm against choking a dog or alpha rolling a dog. That's why I'm against inflicting any sort of pain or anguish or helplessness on a dog. Our dogs trust us with their lives. We owe it to them to not act on impulse, to be the leaders that they deserve, to treat them as well as we want them to treat us.
Sorry this is so long.