denise m
Posted : 5/11/2007 2:24:37 PM
Well things have been pretty slow around here, but I can't believe this debate is still going on, so I might as well just say what is on my mind (like everyone else).
This whole STUPID debate was not about whether this icon depictes animal abuse. IT CLEARLY DOESN'T - unless people decide to insert it in a particular place where hitting, punishing or abusing animals is being discussed. This icon could have been used a zillon times with no one getting offended or paying it much notice, but OH NO!, someone just couldn't resist and had to slip it into a CM post right off the mark. I think everyone (who was aware) has been skirting around this fact rather than risking 'red ink' for a personal attack. If this person had have just apologised, defended or explained herself, this would have been as dead as the horse IMO.
ORIGINAL: DPU
For further clarification. The icon in question was inappropriately used by another member and that interpretation offended a minority group within the forum. The OP further offended by entering the discussion thread and offerred no apology.
I also find it curious that the OP chose to post in the debate but decided to take no responsibility for it. I am glad the icon has remained as I am sure no one else will MISUSE it. Just because one individual can't play nice, shouldn't mean the toys are taken away from all the 'children'.