ron2
Posted : 9/4/2007 4:05:48 PM
A quick google for any recent stats does not support the notion that pit bulls are particularly vicious or at risk.
The largest percentage of dog bites go unreported, especially if they did not result in a hospital visit. In recent stats, GSDs and Chows lead. In the 70's, it was the GSDs and Rotties. The problem is a number of people owned big guard dogs for reasons of security, image, what have you. At another time, I read a stat that showed a large number of bites come from Labs and Huskies. It is not the breed, it is the human failure factor. Plus a prevalence of a breed in an area gives the appearance that one breed over another is vicious. Also, modernly, any time a pit bull bites, it gets front page coverage. When a Long-haired Chihuahua bites, no one calls the papers. Dobies used to get coverage. Whatever people thought was the vicious dog got the media attention. But neither the CDC nor researchers such as Ian Dunbar can point to anyone breed as more vicious than any other.
Also, with the spotty collection of stats, you can find different arrays of stats depending on the viewpoint of the author.
Maybe I should search databases and post every time an Akita bites. Or lab. Of course that requires the media to be fair and balanced, which may or may not be a piped dream.