ron2
Posted : 1/23/2008 7:29:40 PM
DPU
Praise rewards is showing affection and this is not in the same category as food or in the same category as pleasurable food.
For some, not all.
DPU
Thats our difference, not traninng philosphies
To me, it does sound like a difference in philosophies. That some of us see nothing wrong with using food as a motivator and that some of us do not see the affection as not also being a basic need. Dogs are social creatures, so some interaction or affection will be part of why they form cooperatives.
DPU
For affection and praise, it is always there, only shown differently and it can never be withheld, unlike food
But it can. Lexi did it with Petro when he tried to initiate play with her. She blew him off to go and try to horn in on Marvin and Drizzle. So, Petro didn't pursue. Later, Lexi initiates and Petro agrees and they go off. So, that could possibly set up as a reinforcement for Petro to allow Lexi to initiate play, especially if she tends to do that. Play can be a form of affection and it is certainly social interaction.
And while I understand that your first priority with a starving dog is to wisely see to it that he as something to eat and rehab to the proper weight, there is nothing wrong with another dog who has not been starving to be trained with treat rewards, and even some work for their meals. Shadow likes to chase the kong a few times before eating. That was not my idea. That's what he desires to do. I imagined it felt like hunting and bringing the kill back to the den. Work. Or, it could also be to gear up his appetite. Or both. If your experience with a starving dog is as different as you make to be, since, as you point out, we can't understand unless we've rescued a starving dog, then how appropos is it to our hum-drum normal lives? More than one person has shared that their dog or dogs aren't interested in human show of affection at certain points and are desiring a treat, even if they had a sumptuous raw meal or even a knuckle to chew on earlier.
Or, as a wise person would often say, the dog defines the reward or what is reinforcing. We don't get to control that. I thought it was interesting, the notion that a human can decide for the dog what is a reinforcer. Such has not been my experience, just as I didn't get to choose what actually punishes my dog. That's beyond my control. I just have to aknowledge whatever it is and use it accordingly.