mudpuppy
Posted : 12/26/2007 1:27:37 PM
when you read these studies, you have to realize that the animals behave, and the people interpret. And may interpret incorrectly. I will quote a bit from McDonald and Carr: " casual observations in both villages suggested a rather amorphous society. Although certain dogs regularly kept one another compahy, there were no obvious packs"
Boitani: "the group ranged in size from three to fifteen" "overall the group consisted of a core of two pairs and their offspring" , note frequent reference to "pairs" throughout his study
oh, yeah, I think studies of african wild dogs apply to dogs even less than studies of wolves