ron2
Posted : 10/20/2006 7:04:14 PM
The inuit, in breeding sled dogs, would cull the ones that don't make the cut. Primarily due to limited resources to feed the team. It was a long standing tradition until recent times. While at the same time the govt wants to protect the Inuit the way want to protect the Native American, they don't want to allow them to cull. And it literally takes an act of congress or parliament to allow them to hunt seal.
I imagine the same problem will be faced with the chukchi, who also hunt seal on the other side of the Bering Sea. And, I imagine, the chukchi culled their litters, when necessary. (History note: the chukchi ("reindeer people") are an "aboriginal" tribe of people in far northeastern Siberia. The chukchi dog became known later as the Siberian Husky)
It pains us with our modern ethics for the humane treatment of pets and animals but how else can we deal with problems, limited resources, etc.
Shadow has the makings of a great sled dog. But I don't think he will, as of yet, be top knotch in off-leash obedience, though I work on it. In which endeavor would he be devalued or too much of a liability? Outside of the sled dog world, he shouldn't exist. And here I am, with no sled, not even a cart. So, we work on obedience and who knows what the future may bring.
From a stockman's point of view, it might not be unethical. Just as easily as they take a cow to the slaughterhouse, they may put down a dog that is a liability or doesn't fit in their plan. And before that sentiment gets lost, it has been suggested here that an aggressive dog that doesn't respond to the gentler forms of training should be PTS to conserve resources for the biddable dogs. Is that not culling in a way? A rose by any other name...