esteban ley
Posted : 9/14/2006 9:14:39 AM
One of the things I don't like about "adopting" a "training philosophy" or "method label". Is that in most cases you become automatically part of a cult. Koeheler type trainers wonder "why would I lure the dog into a down if i can simply shove his shoulders?", "All possitive trainers" ask themselves and other trainers "if the dog is bitting your hand why would you correct it instead of ignoring it?". Adopting a label in most cases is the fastest way to become closed minded. The truth is that no one method works in all dogs the same, sure, a compulsion based trainer will tell you that he/she can train ANY dog, and it may be true, but at what expense?. On the other hand, when dealing with aggression we've all heard the stories of "all possitive" trainers that will recommend euthanasia because the dog is "too far gone", before even thinking about using some form of +P, because that would be plain cruel.
Long story short, we're all entitled to our opinions, the purpose of these forums is to share them. The fact that every body is here sharing means that we actually CARE for our dogs and want to improve ourselves as dog owners. What REALLY gets to me is when someone starts questioning the my relationship with my dog and labeling me as cruel and inhuman based on the simple fact that I keep an open mind. When training my dog I do it with the best learning experience I can give him in mind, I use +P as a last resort if ever. At the end of the day I want a dog that will be happy. Just food for thought, I have no kids so i'm stepping into unchartered waters and the odds of putting my foot in my mouth are pretty high. But, of those of you who have kids, does an "all possitive" method work any better than an "all negative"?. There has to be a balance, and where that balance is depends on the individual.