sooner
Posted : 10/6/2008 10:52:15 AM
DPU
I don't advocate that just I don't advocate
boycotting the adoption of pet stores puppies. Just need to point the
phoniness of the dog professional advocacy once money is involved. I
am sure there are things that can be done before the puppy is born.
As
has been pointed out numerous times, exchanging money for a living
thing at a pet store perpetuates the suffering of all the animals behind
the scenes. It's moral D-Day for us as animal lovers. On one hand that
singular puppy faces an uncertain future, and on the other hand are the
thousands of dogs who are exploited in appalling conditions until they
are completely and totally used up physically and disposed of. By
providing the store, and the facility providing the animal to the store,
with a source of income you are endorsing their practices and allowing
them to continue abusing animals.
Comparing that to a trainer
accepting money from the owner of a pet store puppy is apples to
oranges. If the puppy is left in the store, unable to be sold, the pup
will either be returned to the breeder, who with enough returns will
eventually be run out of business, or the pup will be surrendered or given away and the pet store will think twice before buying another animal
that they cannot sell. With an organized effort eventually pet stores
and by association, puppy mills, could be bankrupted.
By
comparison, if someone buys a puppy mill dog from a pet store chances
are very good that it is going to have health or behavior problems and
without trainers and others in the pet professions, that dog will
likely end up sick, dead or abandoned. After the pup is sold there is no consequence for the store or the breeder, and chances are the owner would
never know who the breeder is anyway. Refusing service to those dogs
serves no greater good at that point. The mission becomes keeping the
dog happy and healthy and in the owner's home forever.