sillysally
Posted : 3/24/2008 4:14:44 PM
rwbeagles
Smart dog people....realize laws already exist that cover animal cruelty.
Personally, I expect those competing in dog and horse sports to be held to a higher standard by their respective communities and/or organizations then the laws intended for the general public. Horse associations (the smart ones) do this all the time. You are caught using certain drugs on a horse, you are disciplined by the association you are competing with. If that association fails to properly take action against questionable people, then other horse people SHOULD look at them more closely, or the government WILL get involved if the issue is one of treatment of the animal.
There are examples of this in the horse industry. When the Tennessee Walking Horse community failed to step up and take care of the practice of soring, the USDA got involved. When the horse slaughter industry failed to reform its transport methods, Congress stepped in and made it illegal for horses to be slaughtered for human consumption (although they can still be slaughtered for other things and now have to often endure even longer trips to Mexico or Canada where slaughter methods are often horrific).
Last year there was an incident with a well known eventer where she failed to pull an obviously lame horse up and jumped him over the last fence, causing him to suffer an injury that led to him being PTS. The horse community was in an uproar about it (and rightfully so, you should have seen the video) and it was highly controversial. At the end of the day the governing association she rode for took action. She was fined and suspended for 2 months. While some thought she got a slap on the wrist, at least something was done and there was no need to get anyone outside the horse community involved.
I hardly think it is unreasonable to look at a sport and ask if there is a way to make it a bit safer for all involved. They are doing this with eventing by trying to design fences that are true to the course yet have some give when the horse strikes it so that there are less horse and rider deaths as a result of getting hung up in a fence and flipping.
I have no issue with dog sports or horse sports, as long as everyone plays by the rules and acts in the best interest of their animals. While I do think that there are probably mushers in the race that are not there for all the right reasons, that can be said of any animal sport of any kind.
Just like it is not the best idea to have the knee jerk reaction that the entire race is cruel because of the actions of a handful, it is equally damaging IMHO, to automatically circle the wagons just because the person involved in an incident is a dog person.
If you think that animal rights people are loud now, imagine the anti-dog owner/dog sport amo that is handed to them every time the "dog community" defends questionable actions of its own to the death rather than taking a deep breath, stepping back, and taking an impartial look at the way a particular sport is run, or how a particular participant has behaved, and taking steps accordingly.
Don't take my word for it, just ask the Walking horse people who have USDA officials at their shows doing inspections....