whtsthfrequency
Posted : 10/18/2007 8:32:38 PM
Hey, I'm sorry, but someone could grow up with a father that's a rapist.Now,the child is grown up and he ends up raping you, because he saw that what was his father did. Do you feel he should be given the benefit of the doubt,becausethat's how he grew up.
The benefit of doubt in terms of the guilt? No, he committed a crime, and he is guilty.
Should he be given a lesser sentence because people feel sorry for him?
Not because people feel sorry for him. Because he is not in the same meneal capacity as someone who knew full well it was wrong and did it anyway. However, a psychological evaluation would be needed. And not necessarily a lesser punishment, but a different punishment - see below -
I don't think you would want him to get off easier now, would you?
I refuse to turn my anger into vengeance, because I belive that leads to people behaving sub-humanly. Simply punishing people like the situation mentioned above is not going to solve anything. You need to educate and force them to learn WHY it is wrong, or else they will just do it again. That is the only reason I learned. Just locking them up solves nothing and they keep thinking they are right and society is wrong. On the other hand, if this is a person who has had every opportunity in the world and knows full well what they are doing, knows it is wrong, and does it anyway, no amount of "reform" is going to help them. Lord knows what can.
I am not talking abou t letting people off "easier" necessarily - I am talking about using different punishments for different crime modalities. Eg community service versus jail time vesus labor. He should be given the punishment that is just, a punishment that is equal to the magnitude of the crime AND his intentions/ability/capacities when committing it.