Ratsicles
Posted : 8/26/2007 9:36:32 AM
Therefore. it just does'nt matter which is which,,, the public looks at all of these dogs as a problem. If you own a nice bully or an aggresive bully, you are in danger of loosing him the way things are going with the public. That is what needs to be addressed and worked on...not trying to tell which is which. Especially when so many of them are coming out of shelters where no one knows for sure their true breed.
And about the documentary that I wrote about that was on TV years ago... about how the PB came about what what it consisted of (the stongest and the fiercest dogs alive), how does that make the real pit bull a better breed than another bully breed?
Dyan, it matters because
the true American Pit Bull Terrier was specifically bred to be one of the most non-human aggressive dog breeds ever, period.
Yes, they were bred to be fierce fighters. They were bred to fight
other animals though, not people. In pit fighting, the dogs owner/handler needed to be able to step in and seperate fighting dogs if necessary. That means actually getting in the pit with dogs that are attempting to kill each other and using your hands to seperate them,
without getting bitten. These dogs needed to be SO adverse to ever, ever biting a human that this type of seperation would be possible. Human aggressive fighters were culled instantly and mercilessly. The TRUE APBT should be mentally incapable of even dreaming of ever, ever injuring a human, intentionally and otherwise. They were bred specifically to be one of the LEAST human aggressive breeds out there.
Why does it matter if the dogs causing problems are mixes? Because Mastiffs, certain Bulldogs, and most of the other breeds these idiots cross Pits with CAN be human aggressive- many of these breeds are guarding breeds that can and will attack a human under the right circumstances. So when one of these American Bullies that is poorly bred and even more poorly raised attacks a person, why is it these dogs are called "pit bulls" and the APBT breed is blamed for the actions of a
mixed breed dog? They're introducing human aggression into a breed that is NOT human aggressive and instead of calling it what it is- a mutt- they're spoiling the name of an EXCELLANT breed of dog.
It matters in the sense that it's just plain wrong. Why is it that if a pit bull mix attacks a person, it's simply called a "pit bull" and villified? That doesn't seem to happen with any other dog. You don't call a Lab/GSD mix a lab...and if a Lab/GSD mix attacked a person, they would call it a mix in the news. Why then, when a Pit/Mastiff cross attacks a person, is only the Pit Bull side of the dog's genetics blamed? How does that even make sense, and how can you say it's irrelevant to the issue?
It DOES need to be made clear to the people in charge and the public in general that the dogs that are attacking people are not APBT's- because an entire BREED is being blamed for something they are not responsible for. If officials can be made to understand that these are mixed breed dogs that we are having issues with- and not an entire breed- I think it WILL make a difference to the fate of pit bulls.
Saying that it "doesn't matter" that our breed is unfairly blamed for the actions of mixed breed dogs is ludicrous to me- if someone who didn't commit a crime was thrown in jail for one, would you still say that it "didn't matter" if the public thinks that person is guilty?
Education is needed here, and saying that because people aren't willing to be educated, we need to come up with different tactics, is ridiculous. What would you propose we do, exactly? If people are just plain not willing to learn, there's really no way to convince anyone of anything about our dogs, so it seems we're all pretty much screwed.