sillysally
Posted : 9/26/2007 12:26:15 PM
rwbeagles
sillysally
it might be much more useful to speak out loudly against those prominent members of the black community who pretty much said "He didn't know any better, it's part of the culture
Alrighty...wading in again...
Why should I speak out for or against, any of them? Do you take personal responsibility for the idiot statements of Mel Gibson? Did you feel a need to publicly say "hey...even tho Mel's white...he doesn't speak for me, I like Jewish people"?? I don't get it...why do "we" need to speak out? Why can't YOU (general) just assume those views were those of the individual people stating them?
Again...the myth of the "uni-mind", in order to not be grouped together...the burden is on me to "speak out" and say otherwise? *eyeroll*
ETA: BTW who decided they were "prominent", and who are they "prominent", to? Was there a vote? I didn't get a ballot?
There were a LOT of white people speaking out against Mel Gibson--MANY. I have listened to pretty much everything that I could regarding the Vick thing and I did not hear the same outcry from the black community. I didn't hear any white people (or people of any color for that matter) come out and say, "Oh, Mel Gibson just didn't know any better--those opinions are just part of the culture he comes from."
I don't believe that dog fighting is a black/white thing--the best known dog fighting family in this area is white. However, what impression do you think the general public gets when well known members of the black community, one after the other, come out and state that Vick just didn't know any better because it's a cultural thing?
ETA: Jerry Falwell and the Pope do not speak for me as a Christian, but many, many people see them as voices of Christianity simply because they are well known Christian public figures. Whether we like it or not, that's how it works these days.