Sounds to me like you've built separate lives. I have a husband who works til 10 p.m. most of the time -- he's management so he leaves the house at 6:30 a.m. and wakes me on his way out. It would be easy to say "don'tf wake me up!" because I don't have to get up then. But I want that connection.
When he works til 10:00 (or later) I *never* eat without him. If we had kids I'd feed them if necessary, but I grew up in a home where my Dad worked late and Mom **always** waited dinner for him. Honestly, I don't care how dead tired I am, but if Davey's only home for 7-8 hours I'm GONNA be awake as much as possible. He may crash on the futon (and always comes to bed later even if it's only for an hour if he didn't wake up) but I never go to bed while he's awake.
It's a choice -- I have made sure when he's home that I'm there. We may not talk a lot -- BOTH of us are computer nerds (we must have 4-5 working computers between the two of us). BUT we may email more than we talk, but we DO that.
Dogs? It's **with him** all the way. It's always a joint decision. I don't try to build a "life" around the dogs -- yes, I spend tons of hours on the computer helping folks, but even then it's all discussed with David. (Folks have not a clue but he knows most of you as well as I may!!)
That didn't evolve overnight -- But I had a "separate life" marriage the first time around. And I made sure when David and I were first together that we built our interests on commonality. If the SPCA has a fundraiser - I don't go alone. I would NOT go alone. He knows, honestly, that I just plain don't go off and do stuff without him.
I have friends -- not here in Orlando much. We simply have chosen to do stuff together. Honestly, lots of times it's stuff HE is interested in. He's far more the shopper than I am -- but we try, as much as possible, to dovetail stuff so we do it together.
It's HARD to have him work nights -- but probably if it were me I'd probably make sure you're awake when he gets home and have breakfast with him or something. Even if you have to take a nap later ...
Unless you can get him to talk to you, then you don't stand much chance -- but I'm reminded of those articles ... gee was it Good Housekeeping that used to do the "Marriage in Crisis" articles where she'd tell HER story and he'd tell HIS? If JJ told his, I'd betcha he would say you're not interested in anything he likes, so he amuses himself on the computer so he doesn't spend money. He may honestly feel like he has little in common with you and you have built your own life around Samantha and the dogs. If he doesn't share your dream of dog show stuff it may bore him to tears. I know he likes the dogs, but what's his passion?
A lot of men simply simmer like that -- but unfortunately they often are getting their needs met online. Either they are into role-playing games and get their adventure-fix that way, or they're getting their social needs met there as well.
If you've both built separate lives it all depends on whether there is love there or not. You were obviously married young ... and often when we cross that threshold into adult-responsible-life paths can diverge rather than converge.
I don't mean to make it sound like David and I are perfect. He was single FORTY-FOUR YEARS. That scared the bejjebers out of me because I didn't think he'd ever adapt to being "together" with me. BUT I guess I made sure enough when he was in the UK and I was here and we were both online that we DID have enough in common to try the insane idea of having a relationship. We both said to each other 100 times ... "This will probably NEVER work -- the probability of it is unbelievably negative!!"
Maybe that made us work harder. He left EVERYTHING to come here -- he was making hundreds of thousands of pounds sterling a year in a high executive position and rather than take another job when that company was bought we got married and he came here. He worked for almost 3 1/2 years as a glorified copy boy until he found a company here that would hire him without a college degree. So he's worked very hard to get where he is.
On the other hand -- I don't do most of what I *used* to do. I used to watch TV virtually every waking moment that I wasn't at work. (and there were days when I could barely peel myself away from it to GO to work) But ... it's a time waster to me now ... and I'd rather sit next to David both of us reading a book than be glued to the TV while he's reading. It's a subtle difference but it's time "together".
It was actually DAVID last year who wanted to go to Texas to get Tinkerbell. He'd wanted to adopt a pug for a while -- but it was a decision we both went into very very very open-eyed. I do the writing (and the bathing and the cooking *grin*) but he makes the effort to leave early from work when we have an evening vet visit any time he possibly can. Again -- it's a choice for us. We *choose* to try to dovetail things because we realize it's integral in staying together.
Don't compare yourself to this -- I was 42 and he was 44 -- second marriage for me (and shoot, I didn't marry the first creep til I was 31!!!) But I knew all the things that were wrong with my first marriage but he didn't care enough to fix them. But i did learn this -- when a couple spends NO time together they can't communicate. When they have NO interests together they can't communicate. When neither of them sacrifice to make time to be with the other -- there's no incentive there to be appreciative or care. That can't be one-sided.
I guess my only read advice would be to try to crawl inside his head and figure out first how HE feels. I'd bet he feels excluded. I'd bet he feels like Samantha needs him but that he may either not measure up to your social needs or that he just has nothing at all in common with you. Can you change that? What did he used to do that he doesn't do any more at all -- maybe because it's expensive or because it's not 'responsible' (extreme sports, etc.)
You may not be trying to exclude him -- but when you're not together even when he is home that leads me to believe it's a pattern that's developed because it was convenient. Not "bad" -- neither of you are bad people. But just maybe not maturing in the same direction at the same time?