calliecritturs
Posted : 6/21/2007 6:33:01 PM
Honestly, I just don't get it. And no, I'm not trying to be ratty -- but how is spaying or neutering 'mutilating'? Because the OP is asking, in the alternative, viable ways of NOT letting them mate?
So ... surgically enabling them not to be burdened with those heavy reproductive urges/needs so they can just be happy, playing dogs is a negative when having them have to endure all sorts of feelings and drives that the *human* isn't about to allow them to give in to (because incest does produce all the worst genetics possible) and having everyone have to live by a calendar and be separated from each other -- I just honestly completely don't understand.
If they were "living in the wild" completely able to follow their own instinct -- that's a whole different story. But when they are having to live in domestication (and dealing with our messy atmosphere, noise-driven, schedule-driven, no-I-don't-have-time-for-this-now society) -- I truly just don't understand why it isn't *kinder* to help them live happy (and healthier, etc. but I'm not even going to go there) than not altering them and leaving them to suffer urges we have no intention of allowing satisfied?
Like I said -- I'm not trying to be ratty -- but I've always seen spay/neuter as more of a kindness than anything else.
I like to wear earrings and I decided by the time I was 13 that it was a WHOLE lot easier to have my ears pierced than to have to wear screw on earrings for the rest of my life and have my ears be in pain. I wouldn't say mutilated.
There are a lot of real life similar situations -- we do the best we can to make the best long-range decisions/choices we can that are responsible. And when we have responsibility for a child or a pet, we make the best choices for them that we can but with an eye to their long term comfort and well being -- not simply a momentary or short-term discomfort.
And I honestly don't mean that in a nasty way -- if you have to live with a particular thing in this life you do the thing that makes it the most do-able. I'm handicapped and I only WISH my house had ramps at every exit. I wouldn't consider it 'marring' my house but rather being helpful. Practical ... less painful ...
I hope I'm making sense. But I've always seen this type of 'argument' as something I just honestly can't understand. I guess I'm just trying to present a bit of a different point of view.