calliecritturs
Posted : 4/29/2007 11:10:06 AM
I'm right *with* 99.99999% of everything said above (since my dogs eat 'real' food I just say "please don't give them anything I haven't HANDED you to give them")
However, beyond that I just wanted to say this -- if you live in a whole house-ful of people all pretty much ignoring your wishes for what you want done with this dog while you're gone, in honesty, a list of rules 'posted' probably is going to be ignored and laughed at.
Now -- if it's a list of reminders ... that's great. If it's a list of "If he begs at the table please just IGNORE him and he **will** go away, then you can call him to you after you get up and give him one of _____ for doing well." (i.e., suggestions of what they *can* do that falls within your "rules" -- but let's call them guidelines or helpful hints??
If you are still living at home because of finances ... setting 'rules' is probably not gonna work. It sounds "holier than thou" and it's probably going to promote resentment while they pretty much do whatever they want and then just don't tell you about it?? (depending on your family, that is)>
How about suggestions for accomplishing what you need done in your absence?
How about a family meeting (maybe MAKE dinner for everyone and put some effort into doing THAT so when you *ask* them to do something they might listen with respect?)
In other words, when you ask people to change how they regularly deal with a dog they *live* with it's kind of a big deal. I'm not saying you're wrong -- you're not. But people don't like to be told they don't do things right .... particularly when it's what they've always done. Education has to occur somewhere.
If you've got a puppy you're trying to train, gettng the family on board with what end result you want is a smart thing.
If they are absolutely not going to be helpful -- then just plain keep the pup crated. And if THEN the family says "why do you crate him ALL the time -- that's mean when we're home" you can then say "Well, I just didn't want to make a big deal of it, but it is *really* important to me that he no _______, _____________ and ______________ and rather than get upset with you I just figured preventing him from being a problem was the next best solution."
Am I making sense?
Having a 'list' of what you want, need and expect is a good idea. But as I'm looking at these lists (and a LOT of us, me included, get pretty danged militant about what we do and do *not* want done with/for/to our dogs) it just made me think that a family that still thinks "spanking" a dog is appropriate ... a 'list' of no nos probably isn't going to make a hoot and a hill of beans 'difference' and it may just palin spark more resentment and a worse scenario.
I was intending to be helpful, not critical here.