spiritdogs
Posted : 12/29/2007 6:05:31 PM
It's very hard to get hold of a gun here and even if we had one in the house for personal protection, I'd probably get sued or jailed for shooting someone, if the need to do so arose. To be honest, I feel shocked that so many of you feel so unsafe. It's an eye opener and no mistake... almost like looking into another world.
I don't feel unsafe - in fact, I live in a pretty upscale area with few incidents of violence. However, that is not to say that any area is completely safe, and it's probably foolhardy to think that, as jeano points out, there are no druggies in nice neighborhoods...
What was it that chappy said at the start of Men In Black: "A PERSON is smart. People are dumb, panicky animals...." Honestly, if I thought everyone in my area was carrying a gun I would NOT feel safe.
Here, I'm sure that there are quite a few who carry. That doesn't make me feel particularly unsafe, but I think it's prudent for all of us to keep our wits about us.
Having a gun that you are unable or unwilling to use properly is LOADS worse than being willing and able and NOT having one. If every law abiding citizen had a gun, the criminals wouldn't need to buy any!
I think that law-abiding people generally do partake of gun safety courses, etc. And, I don't think the actions of law-abiding citizens have ever had all that much influence on whether someone else commits a crime. If they did, then the death penalty would be a deterrent to murder, which it clearly is not.
I can think of very few scenarios where having or using a gun would be necessary or wise. Mostly, weapons raise the ante far too high. I'm not sure, but I think having a gun in my house would make me feel less safe, not more safe.
I agree that there are few scenarios where I would personally resort to violence. I'm not the person who would shoot someone for stealing a parking space or for dissing me at work. But, if someone entered my home and threatened a member of my family, I think that would be a case where, if I could not eliminate the threat any other way, using force would be justified.
Having said all that, it's coming to something when only naughty people carry arms. I mean, control guns, ban guns.... all it means is that only criminals will have them, because whatever law is passed regarding guns you can pretty much bet that criminals won't obey it. Criminals tend not to obey laws. It's pretty much the job description for a criminal.
That's why the bumper sticker reads, "when guns are outlawed, only the outlaws will have guns".
In short, I don't know what the answer is. But I think it lies with the People, not with government. Making the decision to NOT own a gun unless you REALLY feel you NEED it and you CAN use it properly, even under pressure, is probably a good start. The government shouldn't have to answer every problem and the more they are expected to do so, the more power they will have over everyone and the less freedom everyone will have.
I can't disagree that for me, I have no trouble deciding NOT to own a gun. But, I still don't wish to relinquish the right to change my mind.