Ixas_girl
Posted : 3/20/2007 2:40:29 AM
http://forum.dog.com/asp/tm.asp?m=293608
My response to a parallel thread:
I don't know if it was you or someone else on that other thread mentioned that they would like to have debates/discussions about certain topics. I can understand that...I bet they would be facinating to read. I was wondering if we could do something like that by adding the word Debate in the subject line, like "Debate" Haltis or Martingales?
Excellent point: to consider the information that is presented by each thread's original poster. Just like dogs, people generally find it easier to follow rules, once they are clearly stated!
It is the OP's responsibility to set the tone for their thread, to be a kind of micro-moderator, of sorts. We are adults, we can say what we want from each other: debate, advice, confirmation, sympathy, etc. People could be a lot more descriptive and careful with their subject lines! [X(] I'm not suggesting respondents will automatically "follow the rules", but, hey, how about everyone taking responsibility!?
Often times, OP's are hot and worked up after a stressful event, we are looking for help/reacting to something. SO, our posts are not clear or are not focused. If we are new or sensitive, we sometimes complain about our rough treatment, but take no responsibility for our messy initial query. Respondents could, and often do, help us focus our inquiry, but, OTOH ...
Many of us come here seeking FREE advice for problems. How snappy of us to criticize the tone of voice in which free advice is dispensed to us!! I hate seeing really knowledgeable people apologizing for their "tone" when newbies bruise easily from responses to a hyper, messy original post!