calliecritturs
Posted : 8/6/2006 1:15:17 PM
Unfortunately I'm not a mom (probably been pregnant 8-10 times but I can't carry even for 2 months *sigh*) but no that doesn't offend me at all. Makes me a bit jealous and sad that it'll never be me, but not offended.
But after reading all the responses and as a non-mom (other than to my 3 bestest fur-buddies) I have a couple of observations/thots:
1. NOT ONE responded negatively -- 'zat because we're all dog people and tend to be a tad more earthy and less freaked generally by discussions of such stuff as pee, poop, anal glands, and bile? (ever see how many people rush to the defense of the dog when someone equates 'humping' as a sexual thing?? It always makes me laugh how quick we are to set folks straight that it's a puppy/sibling/dominance/I'mTopDog thing). Or
2. Did no one respond negatively because they knew it wouldn't be well received?
3. I think Bunni hit a huge nail on the head -- if a woman is insecure in her own feelings about her adequacy as "female" and thinks her own husband is going to be 'turned on' or find such a picture pornographic, then it would be easy to try to justify offense. There are, FOR SURE, perverts out there who are actually majorly turned on by pregnant, nursing women (there are fetishists out there who get turned on by all sorts of weirdo stuff including toes and poop), and I'm sure there are women threatened by it.
4. I honestly think, in a nutshell, it has less to do with (altho solidly blamed on) puritanism and hyper-morality, than it has to do with a bizarre kind of jealousy/envy. We live in a society so over-conscious of always being in control, how we 'look', how we must remain *young* (and never saggy, baggy or imperfect), that seeing such a natural thing is scarey. A co-worker is pregnant right now, and she is horrified beyond belief by the idea of breast-feeding -- because it ultimately is messy and inconvenient. She might 'leak' or have to feed at an inconvenient time. A bottle seems more 'sterile' and ... controlled.
If I open a bottle of water it is 'clean' -- heaven forbid I might have to drink out of a glass merely 'cleaned' or get water from a sink that might have "contaminates" in it. Unfortunataely all of us, to a degree, have bought the commericial propaganda that only something commerically prepared and sterilized is fit for consumption and anything else is horrifying. But the same people never think about how many people may have handled the top of that bottle before they turn the top off it.
Unfortunately I think it has more to do with a modern definition of 'dirty' being 'contaminated' ... and then you roll that all up with the idea of something being "morally wrong" and you have a real irrational fear.
Kinda sad, huh?