Xeph
Posted : 9/3/2007 1:58:51 AM
What choice does JQP have but to go the lesser 'responsible' breeders' to get their house pet. Demand is greater than these two groups can supply.
aka "It's not Todd and Jane's fault." Which is bull pucky. People want a quick buy and no questions. They don't HAVE to go to less responsible breeders. Nobody is putting a gun to their heads. They simply don't want to be questioned.
With you always raising the out cry of "There's not enough homes!" this is very clearly not about supply and demand, but about "Just give it to me. Don't ask, don't tell."
They have a choice. It's called "Don't be so defensive and just fill out the questionnaire." Simple, no?
What? Legitimate breeders have unwanted dogs? I thought they don't produce a puppy unless they have an adopter waiting. Or is that the 2nd tier Responsible Commercial Breeders?
Good attempt to talk breeders down, but there IS this thing that occurs called "Buyers backing out." There is also "Buyers remorse" and "gut feeling". The feeling that a breeder gets at the last moment (whether that is RIGHT when they come to pick up the pup, or weeks before) that tells them "These people should NOT have one of my puppies."
Puppies will ALWAYS be produced that aren't spoken for, or WERE spoken for and for some reason or another ended up not being purchased. That's how it is. That's how the cycle works.
But aren't the legitimate breeder basically a mom and pop shop.
More often than not. There are some large volume breeders that breed for show, are reputable, and have nice animals.
Afterall the breeder(s) on this forum stated they do not make their dogs available to JQP.
No, what breeders on this forum have stated is that they do not breed
specifically for JQP. That does not mean they are not available to regular joes, but the dogs are not being bred to specifically meet the "pet demand" of the public.
Sorry there is no proof anything I said has been misrepresented
Nor is there any that what you have said has been properly represented.
Legitimate breeders have no competitors
Yes, they do. They're called puppy mills.
Looking at the situation from your personal level is not how the typical consumer operates. I wish all the puppy would do what you did but that is not going to happen when you mutiply by 10 million.
*Grabs her pointer stick and chalk* Hi! I'm an educator! I can help you learn how to properly find a companion animal!
You just don't get it that if you eliminate any of the types of puppy suppliers, some one has to fill that gap. You say there is no gap and that makes no sense to me.
Interesting stance for a rescuer, defending puppy mills.
Then why don't they. Why was it that I never heard of a "responsible" breeder before I came to this forum. When I purchases my many puppies of different breeds in my life all the suppliers whether they pet shops or byb represented their dogs the same as a "responsible" breeder.
I'm guessing you closed your ears and heard what you wanted to hear.
There would be a lot of screening and those consumer would get their dogs elsewhere thus creating another market.
As I stated earlier "Just give me this living, breathing creature, and don't ask anything of me. Do not follow up on this animal, do not bother me with how training is going, leave us alone. Give us our dog now." That is the mentality many people have. So no, most people who go to a reputable breeder are not JQP, because they are ok with having their privacy "invaded". They are not JQP because they were willing to research.
It's not the fault of the breeder that Average Joe Blockhead is too lazy to get off his arse and research.
The fact is puppymills exist because they supply demand, a demand that the "responsible" breeder has written off by saying that those people should not have dogs.
A demand that responsible breeders are not willing to fill because it is not responsible to breed just to supply the people of a throw away society with an animal who may be part of the family until it isn't cute anymore. Because where are the vast majority of the pups from the mills going to end up? It ain't gonna be in front of the fire on their down filled doggy bed. It's going to be the cold, dank confines of a shelter kennel, awaiting euthanasia.
Don't blame the responsible for the purchases of the ignorant.
What I have been saying all the time is that breeders should organize as one professional group with the same breeding standards.
Nobody has the same standards. What I want out of my GSDs is not what somebody else wants out of theirs. I will not sacrifice temperament and working ability for conformation ribbons. Others will. Depending on the bitch, I would breed her back to back, while others are vehemently opposed to it.
But nooooo, they like their elitist and no competition position. They like bashing JQP for purchasing puppies they won't supply.
Like many rescues, who won't give dogs to homes without a fence, or a dog to a person who has never owned the breed before, or who won't give a dog to a military officer, or, or, or. Pot calling the kettle black.
Re-examine what you say.
Again, pot calling the kettle black.
No I am not against breeders but I am sure there are extremist as you described.
For someone who isn't against breeders, you sure do put them and their practices down quite frequently.