corvus
Posted : 2/8/2009 1:27:32 AM
ron2
In either case, the dog is overmatched or overpowered, essentially being in a situation where there is no choice or option to be nice but aggressed until giving up. When faced with a superior creature that can overpower or outlast, an animal sometimes learns to do nothing in fear of what might happen. Learned helplessness. Or the animal has developed another choice. Wait patiently for the right opportunity and strike back and, if possible, get away. A ticking time bomb.
I disagree with this somewhat. IME, an animal can cope with extreme stress better than this and will often suddenly "come to" and start thinking again. At that point they usually realise they are just wasting their energy and become calm. I think this happens a lot faster if you grab the animal and hold them very tightly so they can't spin around and get that illusion of achieving something to goad them on. I honestly do not believe they go calm through fear of what might happen. I think they go calm because there's little point throwing yourself around if you are not getting anywhere. In Kit's case, he goes calm because he anticipated something bad would happen and half a minute down the track it still hasn't happened and nothing else has changed. His brain kicks in again and he slows down and stops, preferably somewhere that feels marginally more safe. I trigger Kit often and it has not turned him into a ticking timebomb. Some days he is just touchy and some days he is not. Whether he goes mental or not is mostly independent of any other time he has gone mental or not. Usually. Unless something really bad has happened lately and put him on edge. My point is, despite the fact that he would never choose to strike back anyway, he would choose to run, but triggering that flight response and not removing the stimulus that triggered it does not mean that he becomes helpless, or that next time I come near him he will be scared of me. Next time is next time and a whole new set of circumstances.
I have had wild birds in the hand that will struggle and bite and claw, but if you hold them firmly enough they soon settle and will often accept handling with minimal fussing until you let them go again. They get to a point where you can see in their eyes that they are no longer terrified, but are just a tiny bit curious about why they are still alive. They become calm and usually remain that way. Otherwise they can die of a heart attack, and that goes for any animal. They must become calm if the scary thing doesn't go away or the stress will overload their bodies.
Having said all that, there is the very real possibility that an animal that doesn't calm will have a heart attack and die. I don't know if this happens with dogs, but it does happen with other animals. On top of that, if you consistently trigger an animal they will soon come to associate you with being terrified and you won't be able to work with them at all. In fact, with many fearful animals if you trigger them before you have spent some time building their trust in you they will never trust you.
So yes, I agree that it's best not to trigger them at all, but no, I don't agree that holding onto a dog's leash while it is freaking out will necessarily do it more harm than if you were stupid enough to trigger the dog in the first place and let it run away instead. In fact, I think it is more likely to do good than harm. I would still be trying to catch the dog and hold it, though, and I would still say just don't deliberately trigger it in the first place.