Liesje
Posted : 1/4/2009 11:50:59 AM
glenmar
With the younger dogs, I started this long line training as pups. With the older dogs, we learned as we went. Yet every single one of them has what I consider to be a perfect recall.
But is it b/c of training, or does it have more to do with breed, their attachment to you, their level of drive, how easy they are to motivate, etc? So many people describe how they train a recall and how the dog caught on and make it sound so easy....is that the training or the dog's predisposition to being trained? I train recalls the same way and have two completely different results between two dogs. Nikon is 4 months old and is as reliable as a 4 month old can be, he has always been off leash at home and we don't have a fence. I let him out to potty by himself and he comes right back, or if he gets distracted I simply call him back in. We built his recall doing all the "positive" things everyone else does - marking and rewarding at first for a head turn, turning and running to make it a chase game, doing recall games back and forth between two people....and yet at 4 months he's 100 times more reliable than his adult "brother" who's been through much more training.
I see a recall like any other trick/skill/command - for some dogs it's just easy and comes naturally, for others it will never happen. Some dogs will never "get" contacts in agility, most dogs could never perfect the skills needed for SchH titles....it's all just a mixed bag of tricks and any one dog can probably learn a majority of them but no dog is going to be 100% perfect at everything. Coke is difficult to train and motivate because he is basically without drive. I think that's an important thing to consider. My GSDs have drive to work. Even stuff like recalls or training the dog to down in a crate and wait while the door is open becomes a game that builds drive. Coke is somewhat food motivated, in that he will free heel with a hand target that has food or smells like food but beyond that, this dog has no drive to train and work. He's done enough training and classes to be very well socialized and have the basic manners he needs for practical situations (going in the kennel, waiting at the door, not jumping on people, sit-stays and down-stays, loose leash walking...) but other than that he really is not interested in training or work. I can't force him to enjoy something he just doesn't enjoy. The recall is the same way. He just doesn't get it, and he's happy enough staying in our yard or running off lead at the dog park, to me it's just not worth the hassle any more. It's not worth the risk experimenting with exactly how far I can trust him or exactly what he will and won't come back to get. I don't consider him a failure or a bad dog anymore than I'd look at anyone's dog here who can't run an agility course or do a SchH obedience routine a failure of a dog. There are some things Coke is much better at than my GSDs, and sometimes I kid that I'd trade their recalls if they could pick up Coke's skills!
At any rate, a few trainers have recommended we try the e-collar. I think their main reasoning is that Coke has been in several homes that all had different ideas about how to care for and train a dog (some neglecting him and letting him do whatever, some trying to be nice and letting him off lead immediately and him running off...). He really needs to start over with a new command and a method of training that involves impeccable timing and absolute consistency. Sure, the e-collar is aversive in that it uses negative punishment, but for a dog that already is lacking in drive and motivation and is pretty confused based on previous experiences, the timing and consistency are a big selling point. He needs those things when we train any type of command. Right now though Coke is perfectly happy being "managed". There really aren't any situations where he needs to be off-lead so at this point there's not enough need for me to spend $300 on another piece of equipment.