corvus
Posted : 4/14/2008 2:58:40 AM
DPU
This may be silly but I found it a little interesting on the use of the word "or". I agree that fear shows itself by flight or fight (note I inverted the order) provided that the "or" is a logical OR, meaning both reactions are available. From my observations when introducting new fosters to the pack and also the reactions of the scared and timid dog, depending on the duration of the stress, the dog will first do flight and then do fight.
Well, the way I see it each time a dog fights or flees, that's a whole new response even if it happens within seconds of the other one happening. Kit always flees, at least, I thought he always did until he broke his leg and couldn't flee so well. Then he started beating up on the cat when she got in his space, despite usually being on very good terms with the cat. For him, not being able to choose flight makes him feel more vulnerable than he normally does. One time I tried to give him a flea treatment and he didn't want my hand near his neck. He tried to run away at first, but he was in his cage and couldn't actually get away from me. He then turned around and grunted at me and gave my hand a quick boxing. That, I believe, was 2 different responses to 2 different situations. The first time he tries to flee. The situation does actually change in his mind, because after fleeing, my hand is still coming at him. Then he fights. The failure of his flight to alleviate his anxiety leads him to fight. Were I to back off for a few moments with my hand, the flight response would alleviate his anxiety to a degree, and when my hand comes back, he's likely to flee again. This is kinda hard to explain. the way I see it, it's a tree of responses, sort of. When my hand comes in, he can fight or flee, he makes his choice. The action of fleeing immediately makes him feel less stressed and he stops. My hand is coming at him again. His stress mounts, but even though it lessened after he fled the first time, it didn't go away all together, so my hand adds to what stress was still there, and that's what pushes him into a flight or fight response for the second time in 5 seconds. This time he chooses fight seeing as flight didn't alleviate his stress much last time. The two incidents are related, but separate. When the flight or fight response is triggered, the choices are mutually exclusive and whatever the choice, the stress level likely drops instantly.
There are times it gets muddier, though. On the weekend I was holding a small, marsupial shrew-like animal that we had trapped. It switched from trying to struggle free to chomping viciously on fingers and back to struggling back and forth and back and forth too quick for a human to be able to counter. I don't know how these critter's minds work, but fast might be one word for it, and I suspect they are geared to switch strategies with lightning speed. I would be surprised if they thought about it. They just strugglebitestrugglebitebite until they get free. If they don't get free in the first minute or two, they settle down and alternate between trying to bite and trying to wriggle free much slower, and with periods where they just sit there looking frightened. I guess you'd call that flooding. I think there's limited capacity to bite and struggle to escape in the same instant. Especially when you're so small that hanging off someone's finger means you can't hit the ground and run. I've been told that they're much easier to handle if you get them to bite something, because then they stop struggling as long as they have their teeth locked on something.
Personally, I wouldn't use NILIF at least until I had a good strong relationship with an animal. That comes first. From there I'd assess it case by case.