Dog_ma
Posted : 2/17/2008 9:46:55 PM
I'll be the bad guy.
After Ivan proved himself dangerous to Sasha, we worked with a trainer suggested by our vet. This trainer's opinion was that due to Ivan's instability, he needed to be contained or under voice command 24/7. Ignoring commands was not ok, and it was not safe. I believe he was right.
Ivan was very capable of being "willfully disobedient." Yes, that is aka under motivated. We had done everything we could *to* motivate him.
So, under the guidance of the trainer, we administered corrections when Ivan refused to obey a command that he knew. Corrections were given with a prong collar, yes. They were hard corrections, meant to be aversive and not nagging. They were very effective. The first few corrections were administered by the trainer, and Ivan did try and turn on him. The second correction changed his mind. I do not have the skill to do what the trainer did. I would have been bitten.
Giving corrections was hard for me. At that point, it was use corrections or PTS. Eventually we did put him down, a year and a half later. Corrections made him manageable, but they didn't make him safe, and there wasn't much room for human error. He would have bitten us, perhaps even killed us, had we not been careful. I believed this before we ever used any corrections.
I don't know how I feel about using corrections with dogs who don't have the mental problems that Ivan did. I prefer to use other more positive techniques. I don't have a problem with milder nagging corrections. I think they are "lazy" but so is Ian Dunbar's use of the GL.
Most people have corners they cut.