Brian Banks
Posted : 10/5/2006 12:15:49 AM
It's the old debate of genetics -vs- upbringing.
Nobody can actually PROVE one way or another. Some Pits are bad, others are not. The same as some GSD's are bad, others are not, some Cockers are bad others are not, etc, etc.
My personal BELIEF is that genetics play a role, but upbringing can have a profound effect that can outway genetics.
Example: Some people are born lacking parts or most of a certain fear gene. Now one person lacking this fear gene grows up in an abusive family, the other in a nurturing family.
Person A (abusive upbringing) grows up to become a very aggressive, violent person and does some horrible things. Person B (Nurturing upbringing) grows up to be a firefighter, skydiver, etc.
They both have the gene (or lack of), but their upbringing has had the most influential effect on how they eventually turn out.
It's my BELIEF that 95% of dog owners take too lightly exactly what their responsibilty is to their animals, and how much energy and time MUST go into raising a well-balanced dog.
As Dr. Ian Dunbar has said, there are many ways to train a dog. It really comes down to effectiveness, whether the dog is learning or not. And though we may not approve of others methods, we should just agree to disagree and further work towards what works, not our own personal preference (not verbatim).