mrv
Posted : 1/15/2007 9:29:09 AM
Ok lets try and find some common ground. Aggression happens and it puts people and dogs at risk. Many aggression problems are the part of poor training and management on the part of people. Many aggression problems could be addressed through management and training. It is often worth the time and expenditure to work on rehabilitation. So far, I think that is a fair representation of the two side presented.
The differences: Punishment and aversives as a method to stop behavior OR differential reinforcement techniques to establish a behavior with a higher probability of occurance.
The issues I have with punishment based strategies.
One of the methods under discussion involve the need for considerable physical strength. Problem associated with such training involves the fact punishment based training is more limited with respect to generalization. And if the behavior occurs again in a new location, can the individuals replicate the training method efficiently and get control. That question is up for grabs.
Another issue, punishment based training has been linked with suppression of escalation behaviors, so it appears more unexpectedly, (example the case of elephants)
Punishment, although quick with initial results, is not a long term effective method for dealing with any training of behavior.
Aggressive dogs need to be dealt with no question, but I do not think that aversives of the nature of hanging a dog are effective long term: cuts down on oxygen to the brain (no learning going on here); if the dog is placed and the owners are not adequately prepared, the problem behavior probability goes up. More effective approaches would involve specific training of replacement behaviors, management of the situation and practice in multiple environments to promote generalization. All those things need to occur to teach new behaviors.
I do believe that just because we can doesn't mean we should.