Ixas_girl
Posted : 9/4/2007 12:45:11 PM
ORIGINAL: mudpuppy
This is absolutely untrue. Even the most primitive human societies have incredibly complicated social structures and well-established ideas about what is rude and what is not. And being "rude" is not taken lightly in any society
You missed the point. "Rude" implies offense. How can I take offense unless I operate out of ego, out of a self identity that values personal sovereignty. Your assumptions that such things have always been understood in human subjectivity is based on our contemporary understanding of personality structure, and the modernist ideals of individuality.
Of course societies of animals, including man, have structure, rules and hierarchies. Mom wolves/dogs/chimps/elephants certainly teach their babies social behaviors. But to assume the motivations are based in egocentric perspective is to project content onto animals, IMO.
have you ever seen a dog walk up to and grab another dog by a body part and physically drag the other dog off a bed?
Yes. Numerous times. I've seen tugging, nudging, and displacement by sitting right on top of other dogs. The displaced dog either relents, with no apparent "scarring", or resists obstinately, perhaps with growling and snapping (which is then interrupted, and the pushy dog is sent off). I never saw a dog take this behavior personally, as if "insulted." Of course, it's far more common for a dog to displace another through presence, eye contact, or other subtler behaviors.
The idea that a dog would perceive being physically moved as "rude" rather than simply as a human's "privilege" of being the boss, has no basis, for me.
The number of people who report being growled at or bitten when engaging in this activity strongly suggests you are wrong.
Or it suggests that the leadership position of the people getting bitten wasn't established. [

]
I think morality is well and good and simply a part of human consciousness. But I think there are other motivators for behavior, in all animals, including man. Some of these are very much more pragmatic, cooperative, and apparently unpopular. [sm=biggrin.gif]