Ixas_girl
Posted : 4/19/2007 12:14:40 PM
Here's my novice understanding and thinking:
Aloff/Parsons offer desensitising/counter-conditioning techniques, in which the dog is comforted at a "safe" distance from the scary thing. A differing technique is called "flooding". "Flooding" was not something I was willing to try on my own, because I know I am too ignorant to handle certain situations.
So, I took Ixa to work with a trainer at a dog daycare. Ixa was taken into a room with some 15 dogs. She was put in the position of facing her fear, rather than being removed from it. In 10 minutes she started walking freely around the room, tail loose, tongue hanging out of smiling face. Not playing, mind you, but also not "dead from teh scary thing". This is "therapy" I will continue with, it is fantastic -
for Ixa.
How would one "flood" on a leashed walk? By following the "comfort zone" protocols, Ixa's reactivity was being met with my keeping her at a comfortable distance. In order to avoid the scary thing, all she had to do was have a hissy fit, or indicate that she was about to.
She had me trained to keep her where she wanted. What I'm trying to understand is, how can I *not* mover her away from the scary thing? How can I keep her there near it, while proving her safety, so that
I have her trained to find the proximity unremarkable?
During breaks at dog training classes, where we're all on leash, I inch Ixa closer and closer to the other dogs. I ask her to down, then I pet her, which results in her laying on her side for a tummy rub. Replicating something similar to this on a leash walk isn't really so far from desensitising/counter-conditioning, after all, eh?
ETA: that last paragraph is a huge over-simplification, and it's awkwardness in meshing ideas reflects the fact that I'm still working these ideas out.