Chuffy
Posted : 1/20/2007 11:28:12 AM
Awsomedog, first off my opinion differs from yours. End of. I choose not to use the technique because I feel it is abusive. You should not take that as a personal slight because that's where debates get heated and unpleasant. There is plenty of material out there which I am sure you already aware of which can give you the reasoning behind why it is seen as abusive. Secondly, we're not necessarily even on the same page as to what constitutes the "roll" and the context it is used in - for example, Cesar uses it for training to get the dog to submit to him, while it sounds like you use it in emergencies where the priority is to restrain the dog and prevent anyone being bitten.
Most importantly, the main focus of the thread was meant to be Cesars views on the technique - how it should be done, when, when it should be avoided, how he defends it to the people who don't agree with it etc. And looky here, I've answered my own question (in part at any rate):
You use what's known as the alpha roll [flipping a dog on its back and holding the animal in that position to emphasize the human's dominance] in your training. This is a highly controversial technique among trainers and behaviorists. What's your response to those who feel it should not be done and that it's harmful to use this technique?
That's their point of view. It's the difference between going to school and the dogs being your school. One is the intellectual knowledge, the other one is instinctual. I am instinctual. I'm open to [other trainers'] beliefs and I'm open to their knowledge. They close their minds. They say their way is the only way, and my way is the wrong way. That's not a very good leader. If you study a pack of dogs, the first authority figure is the mom, and the mom does pin the puppies down. It's an instinctual relationship that I have to establish with them. It's for the benefit of their species. The reason why I'm able to accomplish what I accomplish is because I am calm-assertive to [the dogs]. So the mother is the first calm-assertive energy they know, then it's the pack leader. Domination, dominating, and the alpha roll exist, and will exist, until we get rid of the species of dog.
[In his 2006 book Cesar's Way, Millan cautions the reader that only a professional should ever forcibly put a dog on its side. With a dominant or aggressive dog, he says, an inexperienced person could be bitten, mauled, or attacked.]
I've got both positives and negatives from that excerpt, but unfortunately suspect that sharing them would be constituted as "bashing". It's a shame that the forum is so volatile at the moment that it hinders discussion and prevents people from comparing points of view. Although I would point out in response to spiritdogs - he doesn't deny that he does use the "true roll" (flipping the dog on his back) He doesn't differentiate that there's a difference between that and simply laying the dog on its side (which is what I have seen him do in his shows). Perhaps thats just editing.
I'd be interested to hear of any first hand accounts where people know of a dog performing the "roll" on another dog as I have not seen it myself. As I have never bred a litter of puppies, or lived in a house where a litter of puppies was bred, I haven't had the opportunity to see the dam doing this to her puppies either, as Cesar decribes, so anyone who does have this experience, speak up!