Jan
Posted : 9/14/2006 11:54:10 PM
I've read this, too, and while I agree that it's sad, I think there are so many forces at work that contribute to this. And it doesn't start with the dog owner.
There are far too many shelters that lie about breed to make a dog more adoptable (ever notice how some shelters have nothing but "lab mixes?"), or that lie about temperament, or that have no idea about temperament but promise "good with kids/dogs/cats/whatever" despite little info in order to make them more adoptable.
But it's not the shelters' fault alone -- so many are overrun with dogs and have few resources in terms of time, money, volunteers, knowledgeable staff, etc., to the point where half the time, they're just moving masses of bodies around because it's the best they can do.
Then there's the media, with far too many movie and TV portrayals of dogs as perfect, loyal companions with no flaws short of the "cute" ones. And kids movies with breeds that are not kid friendly -- every time they rerelease 101 dalmations, guess what ends up overflowing the shelters?
I'm looking forward to seeing the Marley movie because if it's anything like the book, at least it will be an honest portrayal of what dog ownership is really like!
There are too many "trainers" with few or no qualifications, who do more harm than good, or who don't have the depth of knowlege to help with serious problems. One of my biggest pet peeves is the wide array of clicker trainers I know who regularly tell people to put their dogs down because they are "not trainable," when in truth, the problem is that the trainer lacks the ability to deal with anything more difficult than a happy lab. If I'm a cab driver, I make it a point of knowing more than one way to get to the airport -- so why don't trainers take the time to learn different training methods so they have the tools to train dogs with a wide variety of problems?
A galpal once called a dozen trainers in my area to ask for help with her overactive JR. Six of the trainers said they "don't do Jacks" and two told her to put the dog to sleep WITHOUT EVER MEETING IT OR HER IN PERSON, AND DESPITE NO AGGRESSION ISSUES. There are WAY too many quack trainers out there, so even people who seek help with their dogs often give up in despair.
And then there's the fact that often, the best way to fix a problem with a dog is the way that seems most counter intuitive. How many people who have a dog who growls at visitors when they come in respond by putting the dog away whenever people come over? It doesn't at first glance seem logical to take a dog around people when the dog lacks social skills, yet this is often the only way to fix the problem.
FYI, Sue Sternberg is a Goddess, but much of what she says about researching breeds before adopting is useless when adopting a mix because it's a given that shelters rarely know or will tell you what you're getting.
Finally, you have the fact that dog training has only become mainstream in the last decade or two -- so you have several generations of people still getting dogs who had dogs their whole lives and never heard of trainers except for the rich and famous. It's tough to convince these people that they need a trainer, when they spent 40 years swatting a dog with a newspaper if it misbehaved, or pushing it's head into its pool as part of house breaking. Changing longstanding attitudes is time consuming and difficult, and often takes years to do.
On the plus side, things HAVE been changing. Whether you like CM or hate him, he has put dog training on the map and in the mainstream media, so at least people are aware that this is an option. The Animal Planet channel has also gained market share steadily over the past few years, which raises awareness and helps people to understand that there ARE options, even for difficult dogs.
It's a process...but I like to believe it's getting better.
Jan