Deb
Posted : 11/22/2006 7:05:43 AM
ORIGINAL: espencer
quote:
ORIGINAL: glenmar
I think that you CAN take something from Cesars shows if you use it for entertainment value only and not as a guide to training your normal pup. This is my opinion, but I would far rather see folks reading Ian Dunbar and some of the other positive reinforcement trainers than the old fashioned style training, which is what CM does. I personally do not believe that one must display dominance in order to gain a dogs trust, and I live with 6 german shepherds.
Be careful glenmar and dont brake the rules, you know how it is if we discuss that here
Glenda simply answered the OP's question as put. Perhaps you should, rather, have directed the OP to the other sections of the board where dissent on this subject is permitted...
Anne, I was confused about this too, and rightly so.
There is nothing in Jamie's Rules about this CM Discussions forum that limits discussion of Cesar Millan anywhere else on the board. Rather, it states that this is a conflict-free zone designed for people who are pro-Cesar Millan--a place where members that do not agree with CM's methods are not invited. Just to make sure we are discussing this correctly, here are the rules themselves:
This area has been created for those who enjoy C.M and wish to discuss his training, the show and methods.
No rude remarks, no name calling, no foul language.
This is a specific area for specific members
If you practice in other methods of training there are other areas where you'd enjoy yourself much more, please visit there and contribute.
< Message edited by amstaffy -- 10/31/2006 5:12:09 PM >
So the OP posted this question in the Everything Else--Behavior section of the forum, and people answered his question politely, and *in the absence of any bad behavior* this polite thread was moved to a conflict-free zone where people who disagree with Cesar Millan are specifically not invited, as per the rules.
And I know this is just a dog forum and everything, but I am flabbergasted by this. The original idea as laid out by the rules--a no-dissent zone specifically created for pro-Cesar Millan people--is bad enough. It treats Cesar Millan and his practices and his show as an issue that cannot be discussed in an intellectually stimulating way, and the people who want to discuss his show is incapable of handling any back-and-forth.
But to limit discussion about a legitimate dog-related topic on all other areas of the forum? This is... well, I hate to do this, but the only words I can think to use are really hyperbolic words like fascist and dictatorial, and this is only a dog forum. But they fit the behavior. I am at a loss.
Internet Forums are beautiful because they create intellectual discussion for everybody--they are all about debate. This is a terribly anti-intellectual situation, and I feel bad for the OP who wants to just discuss the pros and cons of Cesar Millan's show and cannot do that here, on a dog forum, even though he was friendly about it.