spiritdogs
Posted : 6/10/2006 7:24:50 PM
I also happen to notice, especially among trainers that use total +R, a more general acceptance of euthanasia for dogs not responding to that.
I am predominantly a +R trainer, as most of you know, but I certainly don't adopt a "more general acceptance" of euthanasia because of my training methods. But, owners must understand their liability, and how important it is to manage an aggressive dog properly. Even if your trainer is CM, the Monks of New Skete, or the Almighty, no one can "guarantee" that their training method will permanently eradicate aggressive behavior. An aggressive dog *always* needs to be closely managed and supervised, because once your dog has exhibited aggression toward a human and you know that, you are going to be held to a higher standard than other ordinary dog owners. That's why most rescues cannot take in a dog with a bite history. So, I do impress that on clients who ask about management versus euthanasia. Many decide it isn't worth the lawsuit. Others press on with their dogs no matter what. It's their decision, I just inform them of the options and consequences. And, sadly, there are some dogs that
should be PTS, and others that are euth'd, but could have been salvaged. Sad fact of life, and you can't save them all. I find it hard to think of the good dogs that die in shelters every day for reasons of *space*.