janet_rose
Posted : 3/24/2007 6:06:45 PM
Yes, there are a few stories about these dogs that didn't end well but in my opinion, there is no such thing as a bad dog, just bad owners.
Sorry, I have to disagree here. In large part it is true, but irresponsible breeders
can (deliberately or not) breed for strong , uncontrollable, human-aggressive (HA) tendancies (which is my definition of "bad dog")
or even psychotic behavior. Bad owners can also so severely damage a dog that it becomes permanently

sychotic.
The genes for "wild" behavior are still there in our pets. They have just been turned off by selective breeding (controlled by nature or by man), so irresponsible breeding can turn them back on again.
All responsible breeders diligently breed away from this HA behavior. Unfortunately, there is an irresponsible group of pit bull breeders who do not and for pit bulls this is more evident than with most other breeds.
We have
- well-bred pit bulls who are treated well
- well-bred pit bulls who are mistreated
- irresponsibly-bred pit bulls
- mongrel pit bulls
- dogs people mistake for pit bulls
How do we get people to understand that well-bred, well treated

it bulls are no more HA than other breeds? How do we get people to stop blaming the well-bred pit bulls for the actions of the other groups? I sure wish I had an answer.
I wonder what kind of reputation some of the small breeds would have if the animals were big enough to inflict more serious damage?
ETA: Edited to differentiate between well treated and abused properly-bred pit bulls.