Liesje
Posted : 7/2/2010 11:40:03 AM
In Gina's scenario I would immediately make it known to the dog that that behavior is absolutely NOT tolerated (how/what I would do depends on the dog). Then the dog would be completely restricted from guarding/interacting with that resource. Any time out of confinement (crate, kennel, pen, whatever is used to define the "dog's" space vs. the rest of the property) would be for training, play, or exercise controlled by me (ie, no dog out of confinement free to roam the house/yard and do as he pleases). Eventually I would reintroduce the resource if the dog made progress. For example after doing a lot of NILIF if I thought the dog was ready to go back on the bed, I would invite the dog on (ME asking the dog to come on), pet and give treat, then command the dog off, praise/reward. Then rinse, repeat, making sure to make a positive association with me being the owner of the resource and never having to force the dog off/away, also doing this repeatedly so the dog does not refuse to leave b/c it ends the fun (similar to doing recalls but always "freeing" the dog back to what he wanted to do rather than removing him from the fun).
I don't think this type of scenario is unique to one training method or another. I don't use "only positive" on any of my dogs or dogs I've had in my home temporarily or for training at SchH club and have never so much as had a dog growl or show a tooth at me for any reason other than growling in play or getting tagged by a tooth in play. Even in the scenario given where no damage is done with the bite and it's not a full out attack, I just can't imagine one of my dogs behaving that way. There would either be something unacceptable to me about the dog's temperament, or I would have made some big mistakes with training leading up to that (with the exception of say, adopting a brand new dog with an unknown history, but even then I'd never allow such a dog enough freedom to bite me over anything).