probe1957
Posted : 1/29/2008 10:57:04 AM
Charlie, I CONTINUE to be absolutely convinced that you work for Abady. 
cc431
Most journals that have information to sell appear to be either over influenced by industry rhetoric or are simply misguided and improperly informed.
Charlie, if anyone is guilty of being "overly influenced by industry rhetoric" and being "simply misguided and improperly informed," it would be you. 
cc431
by rejecting nutritious by-products it is impossible to make a dog or cat food that contains enough quality animal protein to ensure its effectiveness and safety.
Impossible? Really? Where is Abady's scientific evidence to support that? TBH, I might even agree. The problem is, when an ingredient is listed as a by-product, a consumer has no way of knowing what it is composed of. However, that isn't my point. In your post here, citing I assume, Abady, there are numerous calls, by Abady, demanding scientific evidence in support of a claim. Where is Abady's scientific, peer revewied, evidence supporting this claim?
cc431
As a result many rations are impoverished while the degree of suffering among dogs and cats continues to escalate.…
The suffering of dogs and cats is escalating because they aren't, in essence, being fed Abady? Really? Where is the scientific evidence?
cc431
Under pressure from the Abady Company, the WDJ claims to have modified its stance against by-products.
Yet, even in the face of this enormous pressure, Abady still didn't make the list. Hmmmmmm. Furthermore, if Abady's position is that WDJ "has been misleading dog feeders since its inception seven years ago," why are they (Abady) even bothering trying to exert any pressure on WDJ? Why not just produce scientific evidence that WDJ's criteria is wrong? I submit, Abady doesn't produce that evidence because it doesn't exist.
cc431
The WDJ will now "accept by-products providing that they are in supportive role." What does this mean? Actually it means nothing.
What does "by-products" mean? Oh yeah, actually, it means nothing.
cc431
the WDJ often chooses as its top foods the worst products imaginable. …
Really? The worst products imaginable? Does Abady have scientific evidence to support that? Of course not. It is, as you said, "misleading" and "industry rhetoric."
cc431
The WDJ claims that evaluating the merits of a food is purely subjective
Really? Where does WDJ make that claim?
cc431
Can anyone believe the nonsense they espouse and still remain in business?
LMAO. Exactly what I think about Abady.