tony
Posted : 4/2/2006 10:32:02 AM
Yes I have heard there are different grades of by-products and that certain companies use will use only certain by-products to keep there product consistant. I did not know there were 16 levels but I did know there were different levels, for instance some companies will only use strictly organ meat in there formulation. There are also different gradings of meal etc.
This is from the TWO site.
"There are different grades (classifications) of meals however and are graded (classified) by protein content, ash content and price. "
Here is a quote from Dr. Wysong responding to a Solid Gold Ad.
Good Quality chicken by-products do not contain heads, feet and feathers. Are we to believe that Solid Gold contains prime fish fillets and racks of lamb? How could it, when such meats cost $5-$10 per pound fresh in the meat counter and Solid Gold costs nowhere near this, and even includes processing, packaging and shipping? It's a real good bet they use "by-products" too. The ad doesn't really get into what they use, just creates a chicken boogieman, which can only be vanquished by Solid Gold products.
Here is an excerpt from Petfoods for Boneheads.
"Petfood for Boneheads"
POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL VS. CHICKEN MEAL
Poultry by-product meal VS. Chicken meal, what's the difference?
POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL contains such clean parts as feet, undeveloped eggs, and intestines, where CHICKEN MEAL doesn't contain such parts.
There are petfood makers that use POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL, and there are makers that use CHICKEN MEAL. Make no mistake about it this is a marketing battle, truly a "What's in a Name?" game. The CHICKEN MEAL guys have done a "good" job of bashing the use of POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL, creating the stigma - POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL is bad stuff. Such a good job that the POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL guys have tried to use the more consumer friendly "poultry protein meal". Regulators , rightly so, rejected this name switch.
BONEHEAD advocates the consumer's right-to-know, changing from by-product to protein is a misguided attempt to mislead the public. It is also BONEHEAD's objective to provide a clear understanding of petfood. The CHICKEN MEAL guys bashing of POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL is just marketing. POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL is an excellent petfood ingredient. Since chickens are not raised to make petfood, it's highly likely that the demand outstrips the supply, resulting in poor quality or adulterated chicken meal.
The bottomline BONEHEAD students is;
Don't relinquish your right-to-know;
Petfoods using POULTRY BY-PRODUCT MEAL are as good if not better, nutritional and economically, than CHICKEN MEAL products;
Make informed decisions.
AAFCO (see "Complete and Balanced") REJECTED THE PROPOSED NAME CHANGE, STATING IT "MAY BE MISLEADING AND IS CONTRARY TO AAFCO PHILOSOPHY."
This is from Woodhaven Labs.
I read this somewhere and thought it described by-products perfectly:
It's not meat, but the organ matter from the chicken, the guts, liver, heart, brains, intestines, stomach etc. I think this is a human thing, because those organs are always the first to be eaten by wild canids, wild felines, and pretty much any other. They don't go for the 'meaty haunch', they go for the gut and pull out all that gooey stuff and eat it.
Meat byproducts in dog food by law do not include hair, horn, teeth or hooves, feathers or manure. It does include organs, including the lungs, spleen, intestines, brains, kidneys and liver, and in the case of chicken byproducts will include the head and feet. About 50 percent of a slaughtered cow will not go for human use, most of this leftover goes into the pet food industry, not because it's unhealthy, but honestly. How many of us rush out to the grocery store to eat a daily meal with tripe (stomach), chitlins (intestines), and scrambled brains? Believe it or not, while organ meats are gross to think of eating to humans, they are also extremely high in natural vitamins and minerals.
Whether or not you want by-products in your dog's food is a choice you'll have to make for yourself.