dogslife
Posted : 10/26/2006 7:26:24 AM
Yes, Colleen. I am aware of the difference btw periodicals and opinion type writing. It is amazing the amount of info out there about pet food. I believe in reading it and taking ideas and opinions with that grain of salt.
I take what I like and leave the rest. If it makes good sense, then it may be something to think about. For some reason there is a gap btw what your personal vet (may or may not) know and the actual research- deemed reliable and what that vet is willing to even speak about nevermind agree with!
I run into the vets that have that food stocked and sell that food and you see that there is very little choice in the matter. They push it like a drug dealer! (no offense dvet- this is only a couple vets) . The only way you can learn is to seek out info. The web is good, others opinions on the web are helpful. Any kind of scrutinizing of the so called "factual information' out there is good. It is needed. Why, because when you have understanding about something as critical as ...heartworm , Heartguard medication is not good for herding dogs, and even some other breeds..You want to find out more.
So, what you call "reliable agencies" are far and few betw for pets. Looks to me like Fed. standards would be good. Research communities, school based- not Brand label based would be best. And then there are folks. Some have some good ideas. There doesn't seem to be a surplus of pet food professionals except at the risk of believing the dog food co. Those are professional. But it is true that sales are going to be the goal. Not coming out and saying about their negative impacts. That would be ludicrous for a co. to do that.
Until the vets and the med schools actually come together, pet owners will have to do the searching!