rolenta
Posted : 3/27/2008 3:38:19 AM
AgileGSD
HoundMusic
I think it vastly depends on the competition in the area, as well, and politics of course, lol. The bitch in my siggy earned her championship in 5 shows, and I wouldn't say she's extraordinary. Just a good example of the breed, but nothing flashy, etc.
5 shows, as in you showed her 5 times or 5 shows as in 5 weekends? I have only known a handful of dogs to finish being shown 5 or fewer times. Course, I have shown GSDs where it is insanely competitive and you have to often beat 30+ dogs to get a major or Belgians were we only get majors if we all get together and decide to go to the same shows. Both situations make it difficult to finish a dog quickly (gave up on the idea of showing GSDs early on LOL).
Well, that's a good point. All of the breeds I've been interested in happened to be quite rare and it's common for a breeder to take all of their own dogs to a show and have them be the only ones of that particular breed. One of them HAS to win best of breed, so they can keep doing that until they all have championships.
Also, I should correct myself. I didn't mean 3-5 shows, I meant 3-5 weekends, which of course is a few shows per weekend. The breeders I've talked to have had no trouble obtaining a championship by the time the dog is two only by entering local shows, with no expensive travelling.
I realize some people spend shed loads of money travelling all over the place and entering all manner of competitions, but I don't feel that is necessary in order to breed responsibly. So in the question of whether or not it is profitable to breed dogs, it probably isn't if you spend more money than you need to purposefully because you enjoy travelling and going to dog shows.
There's nothing wrong with spending lots of money on dog shows if that's what you enjoy, but I certainly don't think you need to. I know that most of the people heavily involved in dog-related venues tend to spend lots and lots of money, but many of those things are non-essential hobby things that they spend money on for fun. Training classes cost money, agility equipment costs money, fancy collars and leashes cost money, premade raw diets and premium dog shampoos all cost money. Yeah, there are a million different ways to spend money on a dog but I personally don't think it's necessary in order to do things "right". The universal standard of a good breeder seems to be someone who proves that their dog is a good specimen of the breed through some venue (conformation, working, whatever), does health screening, keeps their dogs happy and healthy, and offers support to their buyers. Anything beyond that is all well and good, but it falls outside of the realm of what is required in order to be ethical. You don't need to go to a weekly agility meet-up to be an ethical dog breeder.
I'm not saying that anyone's going to strike it rich or make their fortune through their dog breeding hobby. I mean, if it were that easy, everyone would do it, right? I think the main thing is that it takes a great deal of time and effort and I don't think dog breeders get paid enough for their time to make it worthwhile unless it's really something they enjoy. Personally, I will probably fall into the category of someone who doesn't make money because they'd rather put that money back into doing dog stuff. I also plan on donating puppies to be service dogs and volunteering in therapy and search and rescue, so of course that cuts into potential profit as well. I'll be happy if I break even, or even just make enough money that I can still afford to do it.
Professional dog breeding, as in breeding as a main source of income, isn't something I'd really enjoy. It has to be small time for me in order to keep it fun. I'm not sure how I feel about other people doing it, but if a professional dog breeder can meet the same standards that a hobby breeder is held to, then I don't see the problem. I question whether or not it's possible for one person to keep that many dogs happy, but hypothetically speaking, if they could, then I don't see the problem.
Also, I know tonnes of people who if given the choice between getting a dog from the shelter and not getting a dog at all, would simply not get a dog. There are a lot of people out there who want a dog but only if they can have it from its puppyhood and have some level of certainty as to how the dog will look and act when it grows up. Personally, I'm all about rescues, but my husband refuses to own a dog without predictability of breed type and written guarantees from the breeder. There are LOTS of people like that. There's a demand that can't be filled by shelter dogs and if that demand is denied by responsible breeders, it will only create a vacuum that puppy millers and backyard breeders will be more than happy to fill. I don't think anti-breeding propoganda does anyone a lick of good. Honestly, I think the problem of dog overpopulation comes 99% from dog owners who never even breed their dogs. The problem isn't breeders, the problem is societal and there has to be a shift in the way society views dogs and dog ownership to solve the problem.