I'm not so much "angry" (and I'm NOT angry at all really) as "frustrated" literally at how round and round in circles this went.
Just to sum up -- 7+ weeks ago when this started, we pulled a senior blood panel b/c he was 6 and I knew I was seeing some 'stuff' that just wasn't readily explainable (and knowing how nauseus they get with IMHA/low hematacrit that WAS likely it).
When the readings came back super low/anemic, my vet said "It looks like IMHA but tick disease is a BIG possibility so since they still have his blood at the lab do you mind if I order a tick test on it?"
THAT initial tick test came back negative. So we treated for IMHA.
But IMHA didn't 'fit' (because he hadn't actually 'crashed' yet) so my holistic vet suggested a broader tick panel (looking for more varied types of tick diseases since he was a rescue-from-who-knows-where and FOUND on the Interstate originally). So she took new blood (this was a month ago) and sent it for this broad array of tick diseases, *including* the one already taken (since it was 'included').
All came back negative EXCEPT the Ehrlichea (the one first taken) and that one result lagged behind and eventually came back positive after more than a week. But it was a borderline positive.
But based on that, we put him on the doxycycline. Now doxy is NOT one of the known drugs to readily exacerbate immune-mediated stuff (drugs like sulfa and a few others are). But it was literally 5 days later that his blood crashed from 29 1/2 to 20. and then in short order to 10. That's when I took him to Gainesville and THEY took another tick panel looking even more specifically for more tick diseases. It came back in just a couple of days showing positive for the Anaplasma tick disease and they then sent for the complete report on that ONE result.
That's the one that just came back (after like 10 days) But now rather than showing 'positive' (which was the result we asked to have expanded on), NOW it's saying "oh, no tick disease at all, just ANTIBODIES." (emphasis mine).
These tests DOOOOOO take time. They culture things, they grow things, etc. -- it wasn't that they delayed in doing it at all -- I have absolutely no fault with how they handled it - at every turn they made the sensible input (with my input too).
Nope, I'm just frustrated that "life" generally gave ole Bilbo the Adventurer such a flip floppy deal here.
Life is rarely "fair" and this is one of the times it just plain SUCKS, so I guess I"m gonna have to go get myself a Tootie Roll Pop and suck on IT!!!
Every decision made all the way thru has been the best decision made possible with the best information available at the time. David and I make it a point never to go back and kick ourselves for "what ifs" -- because it's dumb.
I just wish the tests for the tick diseases themselves were more reliable -- these aren't tests unique to U F -- these are nationally used 'tests' -- and they just don't show much sometime. We got information on a test and it seemed to 'fit' what we knew so we went with it. And that IS what tests are for ...
So if anyone walks away with anything beneficial from this, it's to always question test results generally. How many dogs get put down just on the basis of "a test"? It happens. How many owners fail to treat because "the test said" and they assumed the worst and figured they couldn't afford it.
Such is life ... we continue to take this day by day ... and I will be SO glad to see the boy on Saturday -- even tho I think he's got half the University totally in love with him. There's worse things in the world than having your dog socialized by a whole vet school of students who all think he's too cool for words.
Me? Yep, I'm tired and I've had it with this crappy provider hassel. *sigh* It took me all evening just to get thru the zillion phone calls to get here to make ONE post. No other dogs got helped today -- I'm glad it was a low emergency day *sigh*.
Thanks for rushing to buck me up folks -- you're a darned good bunch!