calliecritturs
Posted : 7/26/2009 5:05:17 PM
Yeah, I wasn't complaining or speaking badly of it -- mostly I was trying to 'prevent' things from happening.
So often you see people try to "save" the last bit of a drug thinking "OH, I can use that LATER" -- and NO, that's dangerous for many reasons.
Mostly because most bacteria is either "gram positive" or "gram negative" (difference is more complicated than *I* can explain) and it's either anaerobic or aerobic -- meaning it's either NOT fed by oxygen or IS fed by oxygen (i.e., that's why they usually specifically give a tooth abscess a penicillin drug -- b/c it is for anaerobic infections). Some drugs are specifically for "gram positive" or "gram negative" OR they are for aerobic or anaerobic OR **SOME** fall under that "broad-spectrum" category.
But in particular -- if an infection isn't gone by the time an antibiotic is gone and a few days pass with there the bacteria or virus "survives" the antibiotic, it is then said to have developed a "resistance" to that infection and no longer works on it.
The point being -- Clavamox is a darned good drug and usually VERY well tolerated (it's in the penicillin family with something in it to make it easier on the tummy apparently) so the vet is saying it is TOO valuable a drug to let any resistance build. So cephalexyn is a darned good switch off drug that isn't expensive but is also likely going to go a good job but not debilitate the body.
The more I learn from vets the more I respect them -- this is where the term "the medical arts" comes in to play -- it's that subject form of "judgment call" that enables a medical practitioner (animal or human) to weigh the pros and cons of a particular course of treatment to suit the situation.
I wish you much luck in your transition from the retiring vet to the new team. Hope it goes well!