HSUS Lies To Congress On PUPS Legislation

    • Gold Top Dog

    HSUS Lies To Congress On PUPS Legislation

    HSUS Lies To Congress, Public

    About New ‘PUPS’ Legislation

    Would Call Out Feds On Many Non-Breeding Kennels

    by JOHN YATES
    American Sporting Dog Alliance

    http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org

    asda@csonline.net

     

    WASHINGTON, DC – The Humane Society of the United States is pushing new federal legislation that the radical animal rights group claims is aimed at stopping large dog breeding kennels that skirt the law.

    According to HSUS, the legislation targets only kennels that sell more than 50 puppies a year. The bill’s sponsors, Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Rep. Sam Farr (D-CA), repeat those claims.

    They are lying through their teeth, an American Sporting Dog Alliance analysis of the actual legislation shows. In fact, the legislation targets almost every boarding, day care, training and handling kennel in America, along with many hunt clubs and hunting plantations. It also impacts many serious hobbyists, who have a lot of dogs even though they only raise a couple of litters of puppies a year, our analysis shows

    Rep. Farr is the prime sponsor of H.R. 6949, and Sen. Durbin is the sponsor of its companion bill in the Senate, S. 3519. The formal name of this legislation is the “Puppy Uniform Protection Statute,” or “PUPS.” It also has been nicknamed “Baby’s Bill,” after a rescued dog from a commercial kennel that is touring the country with its owner, Chicagoan Jana Kohl. Kohl is on an HSUS-sponsored campaign against “puppy mills,” and has visited several states. Her recent book includes a photo of presidential candidate Barrack Obama, and his reported commitment to clamp down on “puppy mills.”

    The legislation is an amendment to the federal Animal Welfare Act, which requires federal licensure of commercial kennels (called “dealers”) who sell puppies wholesale to brokers or pet stores. This law does not regulate people who sell dogs and puppies directly to the consumer.

    HSUS calls this a “loophole,” and has been pushing for many years to include kennels that sell directly to the buyer. Previous attempts, such as the Pet Animal Welfare Act and Sen. Durbin’s attempted amendment to the 2008 Farm Bill, have failed.

    The PUPS legislation is the latest attempt by HSUS.

    Here is how HSUS describes the legislation: “The Humane Society of the United States and Humane Society Legislative Fund commend federal lawmakers for introducing bills that will crack down on abusive “puppy mills” in the United States — where breeding dogs are often stacked in wire cages for years to produce litter after litter. The legislation will close a loophole in the Animal Welfare Act that currently allows large, commercial breeders who sell puppies online and directly to the public to escape licensing and regulation.”

    Here is the HSUS description of who will be affected: “All dog breeders who sell more than 50 puppies per year directly to the public will be federally licensed and inspected…The bill will not affect small breeders and hobby breeders who sell fewer than 50 dogs per year directly to the public, but is crafted to cover only the largest commercial breeding facilities.”
     
    Press releases by Sen. Durbin, Rep. Farr and other members of Congress echo those claims.
     
    Here is what the legislation actually says, in sections defining a dealer and who is exempt from licensure as a dealer.
     
    A person or kennel owner who “does not breed or raise more than 50 dogs for use as pets during any one-year period” and who sells dogs or puppies “directly to the public for use as a pet” is exempt from licensure and regulation as a dealer. Any dog is defined by the Act as a pet, regardless of its use or purpose. Thus, a person who meets that definition does not require a federal license.
     
    The words “breed or raise” are an obvious and deliberate attempt to snare many kennel and dog owners in federal regulations, including many kennels that do not breed at all. The language is very ambiguous and could be interpreted to include virtually anyone who has a lot of dogs.
     
    The term “raise” is not defined in the legislation, but is generally interpreted to mean a person who keeps, cares for, houses or owns a dog or dogs.
     
    Most professional trainers and handlers of field trial, show, obedience or performance dogs would have more than 50 dogs in their kennels over the course of a year. In fact, many trainers and handlers who employ helpers would have more than 50 dogs at any given time, and most do not breed at all.
     
    A boarding kennel, dog daycare service, hound hunt club, hunting plantation or circus could be included under a definition that they “raise” more than 50 dogs per year. Even many private field trialers and show dog people would have more than 50 dogs a year in their kennels, as they often keep most of the puppies they produce to evaluate. For field trial dogs, for example, it often takes two or three years of working with a young dog to determine if it is worthy to use for competition or breeding.
     
    A favorite tactic of HSUS is to deliberately use ambiguity in model legislation in order to entrap as many kennels and dogs in the law as possible, going far beyond the stated purpose. If HSUS and its elected cronies had wanted to be honest, the legislation simply would say that it excludes anyone who sells fewer than 50 puppies a year.
     

    It is obvious that truth is not their highest priority.

    The HSUS propaganda mill for this legislation continues to attack people who use the Internet to sell dogs or puppies. It attempts to link Internet sales with sick puppies and shoddy “puppy mills.”

    In fact, almost all of America’s finest kennels in every breed have a presence on the Internet. Most have websites, and many run online advertisements to sell individual dogs and litters of puppies.

    If anything, a good case could be made that it is almost impossible to buy a high quality puppy from a kennel that does not make use of the Internet. The Internet simply is a reality of modern life, and a reported 80-percent of American households use it.

    This smear campaign is simply another attempt by HSUS to tar dog breeders with the broadest possible brush. At best, it shows complete ignorance of the real world of dogs. At worst, it shows a vicious attempt to defame honest and conscientious people who raise dogs.

    HSUS is not an animal welfare organization. It has nothing to do with local humane societies. Instead, it is a political action and lobbying arm of the radical animal rights movement that continually pushes for tighter restrictions on animal ownership, with each piece of legislation making a step toward its ultimate goal, which is the total elimination of animal ownership in America.

    Another section of the legislation requires all dogs kept in federally licensed kennels an hour of exercise a day, divided into at least two separate periods. Dogs would be removed from their primary enclosures and allowed to walk for these exercise periods.

    The final section of the legislation specifically allows states to adopt more stringent standards.

    While a member of the California Assembly, Farr also authored legislation to severely regulate dog breeding.

    Co-sponsors of PUPS in the Senate are Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D-CA], Sen. Claire McCaskill [D-MO], and Sen. Ron Wyden [D-OR]. House co-sponsors are Reps. Judy Biggert (IL), Lois Capps (CA), Terry Everett (AL), Barney Frank (MA), Elton Gallegly (CA), Jim Gerlach (PA), Patrick Kennedy (RI), Mark Steven Kirk (IL), Daniel Lipinski (IL), Betty McCollum (MN), Thaddeus McCotter (MI), James McGovern (MA), Dennis Moore (KS), James Moran (VA), Patrick J. Murphy (PA), Jerrold Nadler (NY) and Janice Schakowsky (IL).

    The American Sporting Dog Alliance is urging all dog and kennel owners to immediately contact their congressman and senator and ask them to vigorously oppose this legislation.

    Here is a link for contact information for senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm.

    Here is a link to contact information for the House of Representatives: http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.shtml.

    The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We welcome people who work with other breeds, too, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.

    The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of our members, and maintain strict independence.

    Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. Our email is asda@csonline.net. Complete directions to join by mail or online are found at the bottom left of each page.PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS 

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    This doesn't quite make sense to me, why would a group of people, much less the government target a " boarding kennel, dog daycare service, hound hunt club, hunting plantation or circus" when the obvious meaning of the legislation is to target unethical and blatantly abusive dog breeders? Why would anyone oppose the government FINALLY taking an interest in all the slumming, abusive, money hungry dog mills? Those who are doing nothing wrong have nothing to fear, and since the government is already so understaffed in this area I highly highly doubt that they will target upstanding, respectable businesses like doggie day care facilities - and even if they do get false complaints, or have reason to suspect and otherwise unsuspect place what harm can it possibly do but cause a bit of time wasted and a lot of paperwork? To me this just feeds into the mass hysteria that "the local pound likes to take people's dogs when they aren't doing anything wrong and euthanise them just because they like killing dogs" - horse hockey!

    • Gold Top Dog

       I understand and respect your concern about dogs in large commercial
       breeding kennels, but I think you fail to see the contradiction in
       your own thought processes.

       The contradiction is that those large commercial kennels already are
       required to be federally licensed and inspected. Any kennel that
       sells puppies to pet stores or dealers must be federally licensed
       right now. Thus, this legislation is not about "puppy mills." It is
       a completly unnecessary and devious attempt to ensnare many other
       kinds of kennels in costly and pointless federal regulation.

    One of the things we can never allow ourselves to forget about the
    goals of legislation promoted by HSUS.

    These laws are not meant to target bad operations. They are not
    meant to target people who break the law.

    They are meant to target people who have good kennels and obey the
    law. Our willingness to obey the law is what subjects us to the
    burdens of unnecessary regulation.

    HSUS counts on those burdens to make it more difficult for us to
    stay in business, and hopes that it will be the "straw that broke
    the camel's back" to make us quit.

    The existence of any law does not solve a problem. Problems are
    solved by aggressive enforcement of the law. That is not being done now.

    The answer is to demand Congress to enforce existing laws - NOT to pass new ones that will target only good people.

    Bad operators count on the fact that the USDA does not have the
    manpower or money to aggressively enforce the law. Congress loves to
    pass laws, but hates to pay for them.

    That is part of the HSUS plan. People like you and me will follow
    the law. We will get a license and allow inspections. The bad
    operators won't follow the law, and HSUS loves it! Everytime the
    Feds or animal cruelty police officers bust one of the bad guys, it
    gives them new propaganda to demand tougher and tougher laws...that
    are directed at good kennels!

    That's the plan!

    USDA won't go looking for the bad kennels that are not licensed.
    However, USDA will respond to complaints.

    The answer to those isolated examples of bad kennels is for citizens to file
    complaints with USDA for a violation of existing laws. If a
    complaint is received, it will be investigated, and the bad kennels
    will be forced to clean up their act or be shut down.

    Under CURRENT law, any kennel that sells to pet stores or dealers
    and has more than three breeding females is required to be USDA
    inspected and licensed. This is what the current law says.

    HSUS is being entirely dishonest and unethical when it tries to
    convince people to believe otherwise.


    Federal laws are only one part of the picture.

    Most states require commercial kennels to be licensed, and many,
    like my own state of PA, have very strict regulations and tough
    enforcement.

    In addition, all states have animal cruelty laws that set basic
    standards for acceptable care of dogs. In some states, these laws
    are VERY tough and enforcement is VERY vigorous.

    Existing laws provide complete protection for dogs in commercial
    kennels, if they are enforced.

    • Gold Top Dog

    boredpuppy08
    This doesn't quite make sense to me, why would a group of people, much less the government target a " boarding kennel, dog daycare service, hound hunt club, hunting plantation or circus" when the obvious meaning of the legislation is to target unethical and blatantly abusive dog breeders?

     

         Because animal rights is not about the protection of animals it is about the EXTINCTION of being able to keep pets.

    This is what PETA's founder, Ingrid Newkirk has to say about thepractice of humans owning pets:

    “There is no hidden agenda. If anybody wonders about -- what’s this with all these reforms -- you can hear us clearly. Our goal is total animal liberation. [emphasis added]”
    — “Animal Rights 2002” convention, Jun 2002

    “I don’t use the word 'pet.' I think it’s speciesist language. I prefer 'companion animal.' For one thing, we would no longer allow breeding. People could not create different breeds. There would be no pet shops. If people had companion animals in their homes, those animals would have to be refugees from the animal shelters and the streets. You would have a protective relationship with them just as you would with an orphaned child. But as the surplus of cats and dogs (artificially engineered by centuries of forced breeding) declined, eventually companion animals would be phased out, and we would return to a more symbiotic relationship – enjoyment at a distance.”
    — The Harper's Forum Book, Jack Hitt, ed., 1989, p.223

     Also, check out: www.petakillsanimals.com  These people don't even like animals, much less be concerned with their welfare.

     

    This is what Wayne Pacelle of HSUS has to say on the subject of pets & hunting:

    “Our goal is to get sport hunting in the same category as *** fighting and dog fighting.”
    — Bozeman (MT) Daily Chronicle, Oct 1991


    “We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding ...One generation and out. We have no problems with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding.”
    — Animal People News, May 1993


    If you have any future interest in owning even a neutered pet mutt from the pound, animal rights issues ARE your problem.

    • Gold Top Dog

    HoundMusic

    boredpuppy08
    when the obvious meaning of the legislation is to target unethical and blatantly abusive dog breeders?

     

         Because animal rights is not about the protection of animals it is about the EXTINCTION of being able to keep pets.

     

    It is obvious (to me) that it is pointless to try and intelligently discuss this and any other proposed legislation that is aimed at curtailing questionable breeding and selling practices. All one gets back is the same old quotes from animal activists on their stance on pet ownership. Really nothing to do with the issue of online puppy sales at all, except in the minds of those soooooo paranoid that they would rather ignore or dispute the problem than have the courage to admit changes are needed. If all we can do is run in fear of "PETA's AGENDA", then the terrorists have won. When and if it becomes illegal to own a pet in America I will be the first to apologize for my naivity. In the meantime I will do my best to ensure that greedy, irresponsible breeders (commercial, professional, hobby - whatever)  are obliged to conform to standards and regulations that ensure the welfare of animals.  End of discussion.

    • Gold Top Dog