LA Animal Shelter Becomes Slaughterhouse

    • Gold Top Dog

    LA Animal Shelter Becomes Slaughterhouse

    Los Angeles Animal Shelter Becomes
    Slaughterhouse After Spay/Neuter Law
     
    by JOHN YATES
    American Sporting Dog Alliance
     
    LOS ANGELES – The Los Angeles animal shelter system has become a slaughterhouse for dogs and cats less than six months after City Council passed an ordinance mandating pet sterilization, an analysis of official city statistics shows:
     
    • Euthanasia rates for dogs and cats have increased by 28-percent, compared to the same period a year before the ordinance was enacted.
     
    • There was a 20-percent increase in impoundments for dogs, and a 21-percent increase for cats, compared to the same period a year ago.
     
    Those numbers came from the official shelter statistics compiled by the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services. We encourage our readers to verify the accuracy of this report for themselves. Here is a link to the actual city data: http://www.laanimalservices.com/PDF/reports/CatNDogIntakeNOutcomes.pdf.
     
    In only six months, Los Angeles has mirrored the same brutal results that have been proven in every other community in America that has enacted mandates to spay and neuter pets. All of these ordinances have failed, and dogs and cats have paid the price in blood.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance attempted to warn Los Angeles City Council members of what would happen before they passed the ordinance, but the truth was drummed out by the shrill voices of animal rights groups that knowingly and deliberately misled Los Angeles officials into believing that the ordinance would save animals’ lives.
     
    The animal rights agenda is the elimination of animal ownership in America, but these plans are concealed from elected officials and people who love animals. The leaders of these groups know full-well that spay and neuter mandates will result in the abandonment of thousands of pets, and an increase in shelter killings as a result. They know it, and these brutal deaths are a major part of the animal rights game plan.
     
    Now the truth has come home to roost in Los Angeles.
     
    The Los Angeles ordinance became law in early February, 2008, following several months of intense media coverage and a coordinated disinformation campaign by animal rights groups.
     
    City Councilman Richard Alarcon called it a “humane” ordinance that was needed to save the lives of cats and dogs.
     
    Since then, this “humane” ordinance has taken the lives of 1,667 more dogs and cats than were killed during the same period a year before, the data shows.
     
    The first six months of 2008 represent the first increase in Los Angeles shelter admission and euthanasia rates in more than 15 years, official data shows. These rates had dropped steadily over that period.
     
    In a single sweep of the pen, the ordinance has destroyed more than 15 years of hard work and dedication by many people who had succeeded in moving Los Angeles much closer toward “no-kill” status.
     
    In just six months, the Los Angeles shelter admission and euthanasia rates have soared back to levels that have not been seen since 2002, the data shows.
     
    City Council’s vote turned back the clock six full years, and at its current rate Los Angeles will likely descend once again into the Dark Ages of animal shelters of the early 1990’s.
     

    Euthanasia Rates

     
    The impact of the ordinance on euthanasia rates can be seen clearly in a month-by-month analysis of the shelter data, beginning with December 2007, two months before the ordinance was passed. Here is the month-by-month body count:
     
    • In December of 2005, 1,011 dogs and cats were killed. This dropped to 827 in December of 2006, and again to 769 in December of 2007. This month represents a fair baseline of the situation before the ordinance became well known. It is typical of every other month during the three previous years, and shows the great success that had been achieved in Los Angeles before the ordinance was passed.
     
    • In January 2006, 768 dogs and cats were killed. The January death count fell to 739 in 2007, but rose to 820 this year. This increase was 11.6-percent. During January of 2008, the pending ordinance received much press coverage.
     
    • In February of 2006, 569 cats and dogs were killed. This rose inexplicably to 644 in February of 2007, but soared by 17.5–percent to 749 this past February. This was the month the ordinance was passed
     
    • In March 2006, 763 cats and dogs were killed. This fell to 547 in March of 2007. But it rose by a frightening 50–percent to 824 this past March. This was the first month following passage of the ordinance.
     
    • In April 2006, 1,100 dogs and cats were killed. This fell sharply to 856 in April of 2007, but rose to 1,257 in April of this year, two months after the ordinance was passed. This is a 47-percent increase.
     
    • In May 2006, 2043 dogs and cats were killed. This fell to 1,339 in May of 2007, but rose by a heart-stopping 68–percent to 1,762 in May of 2008.
     
    • In June 2006, 2,636 dogs and cats were killed. This fell sharply to 1,849 in June of 2007, but climbed back to 2,229 this past June. This represents a 21-percent increase.
     
    The picture painted by this data is clear. After a 15-year decline in euthanasia numbers, they increased somewhat in January of this year, when the ordinance was being publicized. The increase was steeper the month that the vote was taken, and then went through the roof over the next four months as the news of City Council’s action began to sink in.
     
    If the experiences of other cities holds true, it will take at least five years for euthanasia numbers to get back down to 2007 rates.
     

    Shelter Admissions

     
    While shelter admission rates increased by 20-percent over the most recent six-month period, as compared to the same six months the year before, the increase has been much steeper in the months following passage of the ordinance. We will focus on the last four months of data beginning with the month after the ordinance was passed, although readers can verify the trend over previous months themselves by following the above link to the documents.
     
    • In March of 2007, 3,067 dogs and cats were impounded. This rose to 3,491 in March, 2008, the first month following passage of the ordinance. That is a 13.7-percent increase.
     
    • In April 2007, 3,462 cats and dogs were impounded. This rose by 24–percent to 4,315 in April 2008.
     
    • In May 2007, 4,299 dogs and cats were impounded. This rose to 5,507 in May 2008. That is a 28-percent increase.
     
    • In June 2007, 4,601 dogs and cats were impounded. This rose to 5,371 in June 2008, for a 17–percent increase.
     
    The pattern of escalating shelter admissions in the wake of the ordinance is very clear from this data.
     

    What Will Happen Now

     Based on both the actual trends shown in the Los Angeles data and the experiences of other cities and counties, there is little room for doubt that shelter admissions and euthanasia rates will continue a steep rise for the next several years. 
    We expect the rates of increase shown in the past six months to continue to grow, as soon as the City of Los Angeles begins to enforce the ordinance. The above data represents people who abandoned their pets because they were frightened of the ordinance, but there has been no actual enforcement to date.
     
    When enforcement begins and many people begin to pay large fines and see animal control officers at their doorsteps, we expect these abandonment rates to soar. Other people simply will surrender their pets or allow them to be confiscated.
     
    The noose already has begun to tighten.
     
    Los Angeles Animal Services already has informed rescue groups and pet stores that they will have to turn in the names of everyone who adopts or buys a pet.
     
    This has caused much dissention among rescue organizations, including New Hope Partners, the city’s main rescue program, and threatens to disrupt or destroy the fine work that has been done over many years to find new homes for abandoned cats and dogs.
     
    Pet stores also have received official notice that they must turn in the names of everyone who buys a pet. The notice says that all pet stores must:
    “Submit to LA Animal Services a monthly report to include the names, addresses, and telephone numbers, of persons purchasing pets, to include the date the animal was purchased by each person."
    From this notice, it would appear that pet stores also have to turn in the names of everyone who buys a pet fish, turtle, bird or gerbil. It does not specify only kittens and puppies.
     
    All city veterinarians also have been notified that they must turn in the names and addresses of everyone who gets a rabies vaccination for a pet.
     Recent minutes from a meeting of the Animal Services Board say that “…we are notifying all veterinarians in the City that they are required to send rabies certificates, with owner name and address, to the Department.” In other cities, this requirement has caused many people to refuse to take their pets to a veterinarian to get a rabies vaccination. This creates a public health hazard that is a direct result of spay/neuter mandates. 

    What You Can Do

     The American Sporting Dog Alliance is urging all dog and cat owners from Los Angeles to write to their City Council representatives and ask them to quickly repeal the mandatory pet sterilization ordinance, before more harm is done to animals. Please let them know the information contained in this report reflects their own internal reports, which conclusively show the high price that is being paid by dogs and cats in the wake of the ordinance. We strongly suspect that Animal Services is trying to hide this carnage from City Council. Here is a link to contact information for Los Angeles City Council members: http://www.lacity.org/council.htm. Attending City Council meetings and speaking during public comment periods also would be very important. Ask Council to repeal the ordinance, and tell them what has happened at the shelter. Chicago City Council is expected to vote on a similar ordinance in September. The Chicago ordinance will be modeled on Los Angeles. Please let the Chicago aldermen know about the terrible tragedy that is unfolding now in Los Angeles, and ask them to completely reject a similar ordinance. Their contact information is available at: http://www.chicityclerk.com/citycouncil/alderman/find.html. Also, Dallas City Council passed a very similar ordinance in July that goes into effect in October. For Dallas residents, it is important to let City Council know quickly about the inhumane carnage at the Los Angeles shelter and the destruction of the shelter and rescues system there. Please ask City Council to repeal this ordinance before it’s too late for dogs and cats in Dallas. Here is how to reach them: http://dallascityhall.com/government/government.html.  

    (Special note: We are deeply indebted to California Pomeranian fancier and activist Geneva Coats, who discovered the shelter statistics and made them available to us. Every dog and cat owner in Los Angeles thanks you, Geneva.)

     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We welcome people who work with other breeds, too, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of our members, and maintain strict independence.
     Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. Our email is ASDA@csonline.net. Complete directions to join by mail or online are found at the bottom left of each page. PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS 

     

    • Gold Top Dog

     Picture painted by the data is not very clear at all. There is a lot more that goes into it, than trying to paint a picture of the whole problem, by pulling a few numbers off of a data sheet.

    I just wonder how many dogs and/or cats that John Yates has tried to help out of their predicament, after they've ended up in a shelter. This horrible  situation of homeless pets has been going on for years and spay/neuter laws are not the reason behind the problem. Our group spends a lot of hard earned volunteer money and time, to get strays spayed or neutered, helping out with some from our local shelter and also helping some that can't afford it. Personally, I'd like to see some others footing part of the bill and taking over some of the responsibility. I've been involved in animal rescue to some degree or another for many, many years and it's time that everyone realizes how bad the problem really is. It's time for legislation that will help to take some of the responsibility away from the volunteers, who have been trying to clean up the problem for a long, long time. And this nonsense that all of those who would like to see spay/neuter laws want to see the end of animal ownership is....well, complete nonsense is what it is.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Like you, I have been very active in the rescue movement. My track record in rescue goes back roughly 40 years. I can honestly say that I have helped to keep hundreds of dogs and cats out of animal shelters over the years.

    The numbers in the report are very clear. After more than 15 years of steeply declining admission and euthanasia rates in Los Angeles, they suddenly began to rise rapidly almost immediately following City Council's vote on this ordinance.

    I do not think the vast majority of rescue people want to eliminate animal ownership. However, you have been misled as much as Los Angeles City Council about the true intentions of PETA, HSUS and other groups. Their goal truly is to eliminate animal ownership, and this is clearly documented in the public record of their leadership.

    To put it plain and simple: They are using you.

    • Gold Top Dog

    eaglerock814
    The above data represents people who abandoned their pets because they were frightened of the ordinance, but there has been no actual enforcement to date.
     
    When enforcement begins and many people begin to pay large fines and see animal control officers at their doorsteps, we expect these abandonment rates to soar. Other people simply will surrender their pets or allow them to be confiscated.

     

     

    I have a BIG problem with people who are soooo cheap and soooo irresponsible that they would simply throw their "pets" away before they would cough up the bucks to do the right thing! These poor dogs probably are not licensed or vetted properly either. I wish there were enough shelters and rescues that no cat or dog would have to be PTS, but I  put the majority of the blame on bad owners. When Ontario (Canada) passed BSL the saddest thing for me was how many owners just dumped their dogs in shelters rather than comply with the new laws.  Really loved their dogs? I think not!

    • Gold Top Dog

    denise m

    I have a BIG problem with people who are soooo cheap and soooo irresponsible that they would simply throw their "pets" away before they would cough up the bucks to do the right thing! These poor dogs probably are not licensed or vetted properly either. I wish there were enough shelters and rescues that no cat or dog would have to be PTS, but I  put the majority of the blame on bad owners. When Ontario (Canada) passed BSL the saddest thing for me was how many owners just dumped their dogs in shelters rather than comply with the new laws.  Really loved their dogs? I think not!

    Maybe those that you mentioned may NOT obtain another dog, and where that might be best for the long term future for dogs.

    .

    • Gold Top Dog

    Why can't L. A. offer low cost spay/neuter clinics? Even us rubes here in Texas can arrange a low cost procedure. And our local shelter sets you up with a local vet if the animal you are adopting needs the procedure. Or does that place out there that considers itself so smart simply like collecting animals for destruction. And before someone pops up and says, well, they couldn't afford the pet, remember we have at least one member here who is relatively homeless, living in an RV with friends, through not fault of their own.

    Age and wisdom have shown that fortunes can change. I am for spaying and neutering of pets. Most people and dogs do not need to be breeding. But I don't see the need for a city or county to bully people. If the city has not offered people a way to reconcile and offer low cost spay/neuter, is that not unreasonable seizure? It would be like me saying that you can only drive hybrid cars. So, I take away your old one and it's up to you to go buy a $25,000 car.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    San Antonio has passed a new ordinance requiring mandatory spay/neuter.  This is towards becoming a no kill shelter by 2012.  It's not working here either but our City's solution is to stop picking up any strays unless they have bitten a person or dog or they are injured.  Our City spent 12 million dollars building a beautiful new shelter but it doesn't have any more capacity than the old shelter!!  But the director's office is very nice.  Our shelter is run by a man with strong ties to HSUS and he is on his way to bigger and better things I'm sure.  I hope he gets a better offer soon.

    • Gold Top Dog

    ron2

    Why can't L. A. offer low cost spay/neuter clinics?

    A while back I read in the news that LA made available a substantial amount in their budget to assist, maybe next budget they might allocate more. I also read in the news about spay neuter clinics including mobile ones, where even FREE spay neutering is available for those who qualify, see this link for some information and contact LA Animal Services for yet more information on what is available.

    http://www.laanimalservices.com/mobile_spay.htm

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Quincy

    ron2

    Why can't L. A. offer low cost spay/neuter clinics?

    A while back I read in the news that LA made available a substantial amount in their budget to assist, maybe next budget they might allocate more. I also read in the news about spay neuter clinics including mobile ones, where even FREE spay neutering is available for those who qualify, see this link for some information and contact LA Animal Services for yet more information on what is available.

    http://www.laanimalservices.com/mobile_spay.htm

     

     

    A quick google shows lots of options for free and low cost spay/neuter options in LA, so a far as I'm concerned the increase in shelter numbers is not just about not having the means. It's also about not having the will.  

    • Gold Top Dog

    denise m

    A quick google shows lots of options for free and low cost spay/neuter options in LA, so a far as I'm concerned the increase in shelter numbers is not just about not having the means. It's also about not having the will.  

    Yes just look around, even by phone, or even ask around locally. By the way, I think that the Sam Simon Foundation’s mobile clinic is really great, they not only offer FREE spay/neuter surgeries but also FREE surgery for other things, plus they offer FREE vaccinations, flea control, deworming, nail trims, and antibiotics. To qualify, applicants must have a total household income of less than $40,000 per year.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    I have the same problem with people who abandon or throw away their dogs that you do. I consider them to be lower than scum.

    But please remember that this ordinance will not affect the scum at all. The scum will simply abandon their pets. The new law will afect only the good people, because they are the people wjo will try to obey it.

    I STRONGLY blame the animal rights groups for pushing laws that they know in advance will result in the abandonment of thousands of animals. I hold PETA and HSUS personally responsible for every dog and cat that dies in Los Angeles because of this ordinance. They KNOW full well what will happen, and do nothing to stop the killing of animals because they WANT to kill them. That is their real agenda. They want to eliminate animals from American life.

    Read what PETA head Ingrid Newkirk says to defend the murder of more than 90% of the animals brought to their Virginia shelter. This woman believes they are better off dead than in a loving home. They are cold blooded killers. They make the scumbags who abandon animals look good.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    denise m
    A quick google shows lots of options for free and low cost spay/neuter options in LA, so a far as I'm concerned the increase in shelter numbers is not just about not having the means. It's also about not having the will.

    You are right, I think.

    Sometimes, when I stop at a Petsmart or Petco, the sales associate will hand out a flyer for low or no-cost spay/neuter specials. The resources are there. Even though I could and did afford our own vet's price, I could have just as easily used that flyer. There were no qualifying conditions on it.

    The local animal shelter charges $44 for dog adoption, regardless of breed or size. This fee includes the legal adoption (making you owner of record), necessary vaccs, and (if the animal needs the procedure) spay/neuter at one or two of the area vets who support this cause. As in, $44 covers paperwork, shots, and the procedure.

    So, then, that leaves the question as to how effective it will be if a city is euthanizing dogs that were seized because they haven't been fixed, yet. Don't get me wrong, I believe s/n is a primary responsibilty of pet ownership and should be budgeted when considering owning a pet.

    It seems that we've discussed so much about how to solve these problems but it always boils down to humans.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Please take a look at the Los Angeles shelter statistics for unweaned puppies : http://www.laanimalservices.com/PDF/reports/UnweanedPuppiesIntakeNOutcomes.pdf .

    The statistics are remarkable. Almost no puppies enter the shelter, and most of them find homes.

    It seems to destroy the argument about people receklessly allowing their dogs to breed. It points to the probability that irresponsible owners of older dogs are the problem.

    • Gold Top Dog

    eaglerock814

    I have the same problem with people who abandon or throw away their dogs that you do. I consider them to be lower than scum.

    Then of equal status are the 'good' citizens, the dog lovers who do not take in these dogs, who do not volunteer to help place these dogs, that allow the dogs to a fate that they most certainly can change if they want to.

    • Gold Top Dog

    I think you're being a little judgmental, DPU.

    To say that dog owners who do not do rescue work are doing something wrong, would be like saying that you are a bad person because you to not take in human orphans, volunteer at a homeless shelter or help feed starving people in Africa.

    Probably both of us would agree that the world needs more caring and involved people, and probably most of us fall short on doing what we can do to help the world. But that doesn't make us bad people, either.

    The flip side of the coin is that the vast majority of people who do rescue work are dog owners, and a high percentage of them are people who raise and/or breed dogs. There are a lot of very good people in the dog community.