In Defense Of Dog Breeders

    • Gold Top Dog

    In Defense Of Dog Breeders

    In Defense of Dog Breeders

     

    How Animal Rights Has Twisted Our Language

     
    by JOHN YATES
    American Sporting Dog Alliance
     
    “You’re a dog breeder!!!!!!!!!!!!”
     
    In today’s world, that is a very loaded statement. It’s more like an accusation.
     
    “I told the television news reporter that I breed dogs,” a friend from Dallas told me recently. “He looked at me like he thought I was a harlot.”
     
    Dog owners have allowed the animal rights movement to redefine our language in order to paint everything we do in the worst possible light. If we say that we breed dogs, the looks we get ask us if we own a “puppy mill” or if we are a “backyard breeder.”
     
    If we reply that we are a “hobby breeder,” someone immediately asks how we can consider living creatures a hobby. Some of us try the word “fancier.” We fool no one.
     
    The most pathetic response to the question is when we call ourselves “responsible breeders.” Responsible to whom? Who defines “responsible” and “irresponsible?” Some bureaucrat? A politician? Animal rights cretins who say there is no such thing as a responsible breeder? Animal rights fanatics would rather kill all animals than see someone love them. In fact, that’s their plan.
     
    If we say we are not breeders, it makes us “pet hoarders.” We are tarred as mentally ill people in need of psychotherapy.
     
    The entire language about dog ownership has been hijacked by the rhetoric of the animal rights movement.
     
    The worst part is that we have allowed it to happen. We are too fearful and wimpy to stand up for ourselves. We keep searching for inoffensive euphemisms to describe what we do, so that we don’t open ourselves up to attack.
     
    By doing that, however, we have engineered our own demise.
     
    The animal rights movement will not go away. Its agenda is to destroy our right to own or raise animals. Animal rights groups have declared war on all animal ownership, and they won’t stop until they either win or we finally have the courage to stand up and defeat them.
     
    They have not taken that kind of power over us. We have given it away. We have surrendered our beliefs to the enemy.
     
    We apologize for what we do. We make weak excuses for things like animal shelter euthanasia, accidental matings, dog fighting and dangerous dogs. We take at least part of the responsibility for these problems onto our own shoulders, when in truth we have no responsibility at all for creating them.
     
    None whatsoever!
     
    I am sick and tired of watching dog owners constantly apologize and grovel, and allowing themselves to be put on the defensive.
     
    Enough! It’s time to stop sniveling about who we are and what we do.
     
    Let me state clearly and for the record: I am a dog breeder. I breed dogs. I raise puppies. I like it. I’m very proud of it.
     
    If you don’t like it, you are free to take a flying leap. I don’t care what you think of me or what I do.
     
    I raise two or three litters of English setter puppies a year. I wish I could raise more puppies, but can’t figure out how to do it without driving myself into bankruptcy.
     
    My dogs work for a living, just like I do. They have to be good at their jobs, just like I do. If they aren’t good at their jobs, I don’t keep them and I certainly don’t breed them.
     
    They are hunting dogs, and they have to be able to perform to a very demanding standard of excellence to be worthy of breeding. They have to meet the exacting standard of championship-quality performance in the toughest competition.
     
    They are professional athletes.
     
    Most of them don’t make the cut. Those dogs make wonderful hunting companions or family members.
     
    I have never had a dog spayed or neutered, except for medical reasons, and I don’t intend to start now. If a dog is good enough for me to keep, it is good enough to breed.
     
    Nor have I ever sold a puppy on a spay/neuter contract. With performance dogs, it takes two or three years to know what you have. There is no way that anyone can know the full potential or worthiness of a young puppy. I hope every puppy that I sell will become a great one that is worthy of being bred.
     
    I do not feel bad (and certainly do not feel guilty) if someone decides to breed a dog from my kennel that I did not choose to keep for myself when it was a puppy. It still will be a very nice dog, and I have worked very hard on my breeding program for 35 years to assure that very high quality genetics will be passed along and concentrated in any dog that I sell.
     
    On occasion, I have a puppy that has a serious flaw. I don’t sell those puppies, even though they would make many people very happy. I give them away free to good homes, and the definition of a good home is mine because it’s my puppy. I own it. You don’t.
     
    My responsibility is to the puppy. It is not to you, and it’s not to some gelatinous glob called “society.” I consider myself to be personally responsible for every puppy I raise, from birth until the day it dies. It always has a home in my kennel, if its new owner can’t keep it or no longer wants it.
     
    That’s a contract written in blood between the puppy and me. It’s a contract written with a handshake with the puppy’s new owner.
     
    I laugh cynically when someone from the Humane Society of the United States or People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals ask if I am a responsible breeder. HSUS and PETA are two of the most vicious, bloodthirsty and dishonest snake pits on Earth. Their moral credibility is a negative number. PETA butchers more than 90-percent of the animals it “rescues” every year, and HSUS supports programs and policies that result in the needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of animals every year.
     
    By now, I assume that I have pushed all of the buttons of the animal rights crazies. I can hear them snort and see their pincurls flapping in indignation. It makes my day.
     
    Can’t you hear them, too? They are calling me an exploiter of animals. They are saying that I ruthlessly cull and manipulate the genetics of my dogs. They saying that I make the exploited poor beasts work for a living and live up to impossible standards. They will say that I do this to feed and gratify my own fat ego. They will say that I sell them for money and exploit them for personal gain. Then, of course, they will say that I use them to viciously hunt innocent wild animals.
     
    Terrible, terrible me! My mother should have a son like this! She was such a nice woman.
     
    Well, I plead guilty to all of the charges. Know what else? I don’t feel guilty, not even a little bit. I do it. I like it. I feel good about it.
     
    Now I will speak in my own defense – as a dog breeder.
     
    I happen to love dogs. I love being around them. I love working with them. I love watching a puppy grow up and discover its potential. I love having the privilege of experiencing a truly great dog in its prime. I love sharing supper with my dogs, wrestling with puppies, and sacking out with them on the couch. I lose sleep when they get sick, and work myself unmercifully to care for them. I spend almost all of the money I have on them, and some money that I don’t have. My heart breaks when they grow old and die. I have a dozen lifetimes worth of beautiful memories.
     
    What do the animal rights freaks have? They have their ideology. They look in the mirror and feel smug and self-righteous, as if God has personally anointed them to protect animals from the likes of me.
     
    What they have is nothing at all. Utter sterility. A world devoid of life and love.
     
    They can keep it.
     
    My life is filled with love and joy and beauty, and I owe most of it to my dogs. They have helped to keep me sane when sanity was not a given. They have given me courage on the days when all I wanted to do was lie down and quit. They have given me strength to endure on the days when all I wanted to do is run away and hide.
     
    I owe them my life.
     
    The animal rights folks are right. I ruthlessly cull and manipulate genetics. To make the cut, my breeding dogs have had to live up to the most exacting possible standards and pass the most strenuous tests.
     
    I am very proud of doing that.
     
    The result is that the vast majority of people who buy a puppy from me love it. When I sell a puppy, chances are that it has found a home for the rest of its life. The puppy will have a great chance of leading a wonderful life. I produce puppies that make people happy to own them and want to keep them. That’s my job as a breeder.
     
    I have done this through rigorous selection. My puppies today are the result of 35 years of my stubborn insistence about never breeding a dog that does not have a wonderful disposition, perfect conformation, great intelligence, exceptional natural ability, breathtaking style and that mysterious ingredient called genius.
     
    Every puppy born in my kennel has six or eight or 10 generations of my own dogs in its pedigree. All of those ancestors possess a high level of each of those desirable traits. I have raised, trained and grown old with every dog listed in several generations of each puppy’s pedigree.
     
    Simply put, my puppies today are a lot nicer than my puppies of 35 years ago. Today, there is a much higher percentage of good ones, a much lower percentage of deficient ones, a much higher average of good qualities, and a much higher percentage of true greatness emerging from my kennel today.
     
    That’s what it means to be a breeder.
     
    Does that feed my ego? Yep. I like having my ego stroked. Don’t you? If you don’t, you are in very deep trouble as a human being.
     
    But I’ll tell you what else it does. It makes for happier dogs. It makes for dogs that lead better lives, find permanent families and homes, and get to experience love in many forms.
     
    It also makes for healthier dogs. Generation after generation of perfect functional conformation means that the dogs are less likely to get injured, wear out or develop arthritis. Many generations of selection for vigor, toughness and good health means that they are able to laugh at the extremes of climate, weather and terrain.
     
    I also have virtually eliminated genetic health problems from my strain of dogs. For example, hip dysplasia is the most common genetic problem in English setters, afflicting a reported four-percent of the breed. In the past 20 years, I have had only two questionable hip x-rays, which both would be rated “fair” by the Orthopedic Foundation of America (OFA). The last one was 10 years ago.
     
    Yes, I am very proud of being a breeder. I did that.
     
    I am proud, too, that I am producing dogs that are so intelligent that it’s scary, so loyal that they can be your complete partner in the field while also possessing the extreme independence needed to do their job well, so loving that you want them with you every second of the day, so bold and brazen that nothing bothers them, and just plain drop-dead gorgeous to boot.
     
    They make me smile a lot. I think I make them smile, too.
     
    But, the animal rights whackos say I am doing it for the money. They accuse me of exploiting animals for profit.
     
    Yep. Every chance I get. I am very happy when I am able to sell a puppy for cold, hard cash. It makes me feel good.
     
    It makes me feel good because it shows me that someone appreciates the work I am doing. It makes me feel good because I have earned it, and earned it honestly.
     
    My only regret is that I have not made more money as a breeder. With all of the sacrifices I have made and the hard work I have done, I should be rolling in money.
     
    Alas, I am not.
     
    It has been years since I actually have made money on a litter of puppies. Usually, I lose my shirt.
     
    For every puppy I sell, there is another one that I keep to evaluate, and a couple of other ones that I am keeping for two or three years to evaluate for their worthiness to breed. Then there are dogs that are in competition, and that costs bushels of money, not to mention old dogs that are retired and have a home here until they die of old age. Almost a third of the dogs in my kennel are elderly and retired, and it takes a lot of money to care for them.
     
    It takes money for dog food, supplies, veterinary bills, kennel licenses, repairs, vehicle use for training and field trials, advertising, internet, phone bills, and four pairs of good boots a year. It takes money. Lots of money. Bundles of money.
     
    Oh, Lord, please help me to sell some more puppies!
     
    Besides, what’s wrong with making money? It is a rather fundamental American value. Making money is something to be proud of, as long as it’s done honestly.
     
    Even animal rights bozos have to eat. Someone has to make money to stuff veggies down their gullets, and organic veggies are rather pricey. Most working folks can’t afford them.
     
    I also can’t help but notice that most animal rights activists over the age of 30 drive pretty fancy cars (we are talking about the Beamer set, folks), live in rather fancy houses and dress very well indeed. I can’t help but notice that many of the leaders of animal rights groups have pretty cushy gigs, with high-end six-digit salaries, fancy offices, and all the perks.
     
    I guess they are saying that it’s ok for them to make money by the truckload, even if making money turns dog breeders into immoral greed bags. There is no one in America who exploits dogs for as much money as the paid leaders of animal rights groups. Their fat salaries depend on having animal issues to exploit. If there were no animals for them to exploit, they would have to get a real job.
     
    It’s a rather perplexing dual standard, don’t you think?
     
    Well, maybe it’s not perplexing after all. The only thing perplexing about hypocrisy is that so many people can’t see through it.
     
    My next sin is making my dogs work for a living. The animal rights people try to paint a picture of whipping dogs beyond endurance, exploiting them, creating misery and causing unhappiness. The poor, downtrodden, huddled masses. You know the tune.
     
    Only problem is, my dogs don’t agree. They love to work. They love their jobs. The only time they are sad is when it is not their turn to work. For my dogs, working is sheer joy and passion! They love every second of it.
     
    What animal rights groups live for is creating imaginary victims. Helping victims makes some people feel better about themselves and, of course, it helps them to part with their money so that animal rights leaders can live high on the hog. Oops. I mean high on the carrot. How callous of me. I guess I’m just not a sensitive kind of guy.
     
    Back to the exploited masses of bird dogs. Try an experiment sometime. Read an animal rights essay, and substitute the word “proletariat” for the word “animal.” You will find that animal rights philosophy actually is pure and straightforward Marxian doctrine.
     
    I guess my dogs are not natural Marxists. They love their jobs. They are excited about their jobs. Their jobs make them very happy.
     
    Animal rights people can’t seem to grasp that people can feel that way about their work, too. It’s how I feel about the very hard work of being a dog breeder. It makes me happy.
     
    Another way of putting it is that both my dogs and my own example provide proof that life is not pointless drudgery and exploitation. We provide living proof that joy, beauty and personal fulfillment are possible in life.
     
    I just don’t think of those qualities when I think of the animal rights fanatics I have known. They seem a rather sad and sorry lot to me. I’ll take my dogs’ company any day.
     
    Oh, but the icing on the cake is that I use these poor exploited creatures to hunt innocent birds. How terrible!
     
    Hunting, of course, is a subject of its own, and I won’t attempt to cover it here.
     
    Suffice it to say that opposition to hunting flies in the face of a few million years of human evolution, the entire balance of nature everywhere on Earth, and common sense.
     
    I know one thing for certain. The fact that we have healthy populations of most species of wild birds and animals today is only because hunters have cared enough to support strong conservation measures. We have preserved millions of acres of habitat that is vital to the survival of many species, saved more millions of acres of wilderness from development, supported the protection of endangered species everywhere, and put our money where are mouths are.
     
    Animal rights groupies do nothing but blow hot air, when they aren’t too busy destroying the land and the animals that live on it to create vast wastelands of industrialized monoculture.
     
    I am proud to be a hunter, too.
     
    It’s time for every dog owner and breeder to stand up proudly and be counted.
     
    Each one of you has done far more to enhance the quality of life of both people and dogs than all of the animal rights activists put together.
     
    So stand up and shout it to the rooftops!
     
    Stop crawling around on your bellies and apologizing. Your dogs deserve better from you. You will just have to get a little tougher if you want to live up to your dogs.
     
    What you are doing is right.
     
    It’s just that simple.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.
     
    The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of our members, and maintain strict independence.
     Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. Our email is ASDA@csonline.net. Complete directions to join by mail or online are found at the bottom left of each page. PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS 

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    In years gone by, top breeders would be considered "mills" by todays standards because of the volume of pups they produced.  These days breeders don't often see what they envision for their breed, or even their line, come about.... because of the ethics of producing too many litters.  I can think of two individuals I know of who have handed their line on to a younger relative and watched them take it further.

    I've visited "breeders" when looking for a pup.  Some didn't define themselves as breeder... because they only "bred" so very rarely and carefully.  They HAD bred some litters, but they didn't introduce themselves as "dog breeders". 

    If someone defines themself a "breeder" it does sound like they are breeding frequently and if that is the case they may well be a BYB or a mill.  In this day and age, why should that not be questioned?  If breeders are so sure what they are doing is fine and dandy, why hunt for euphamisms to soften it? 

    I'm struggling to understand your argument to be honest. 

    "Hobby breeder" and "fancier" are hardly new phrases.  I don't have a problem with the term hobby breeder and actually prefer it to so-called "professional" breeders.  To me, the former implies they are doing it for the love of it.... because they love the dogs and are passionate about the breed, with the welfare of the animals first and foremost in their priorities.  The latter implies money.  A hobby is something you SPEND money on because you love doing it... a profession is about making money.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Why do people try and soften the term 'breeder'? Mostly because of social pressure.

     I was kicked off a local rescue list for admitting that someday (this was 9 years ago) I wanted to responsibly breed- which included showing and working- dogs. I was put on DNA lists of a local shelter a 'potential breeder' due to my intact male dog (at the time, I just had Indy).

     
    Maybe you LIKE being called things like "greeder" and told "it's YOUR fault that there are puppies dying in our shelter!" by people at the dog park when you admit that yes, your dogs are intact and you intend to breed them. People who were friendly and impressed by how well your dogs listened before now accuse you of overworking them, of using them to gratify your ego, of being 'obsessed' with your dogs.

     Maybe you're just tougher than I am, though.
     

    • Gold Top Dog

    No I'm not tough.  I don't want to breed right now, not for many years and maybe not at all. 

    I think its great that more people are getting educated.  In general chat, the_gopher shares how some guy with an intact male mix breed asked for breeding rights to her young dog.... and urged to to "at least get one litter out of her".  Between the two, I think I prefer the folks at your dog park.

    I think it's good that breeders are being held up to greater scrutiny.  If someone was at the park with me and mentioned breeding their dog sure I'd say something.  Because frankly MOST people who breed, shouldn't.  The laws of chance dictate they probably fall into that category.

    Most people who come here and mention being "breeders" are lucky to get off without being flamed.... rudeness is of course never OK, but its easy to see why people think "this probably is not good" when reading the opening post. 

    I know a lady who has springers.  That's how she puts it.... she has springers.  Working english springer spaniels.  You can tell by the way she talks about her dogs that she loves them and is knowledgeable about them.  Talk to her long enough and it will be apparent she has also bred them in the past.... and again her knowledge and experience is apparent.  She doesn't say "I breed dogs".  Because she doesn't.  She does't do it regularly, or to make a living or as something to do in her spare time.  I don't know.... she hasn't been called names because she doesn't see the need to advertise the fact that she has bred a few litters... or even is planning one.  If anyone finds out, it's usually after finding out just how well she knows her stuff, so it really is a non issue. 
     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Pwca

     I was kicked off a local rescue list for admitting that someday (this was 9 years ago) I wanted to responsibly breed- which included showing and working- dogs. I was put on DNA lists of a local shelter a 'potential breeder' due to my intact male dog (at the time, I just had Indy)

     

    This sort of thing kills me, and boggles my mind.

    Earlier this year I stepped in as an emergency foster for a mama cat and her kittens. They were semi-feral and would have been euth'd at the shelter. The rescue was officially full, and I fostered on the side, outside of normal protocols.

    I spent time I didn't have to socialize those kittens. I found two of them EXCELLENT homes, and two were passed on to another foster who had more free time.

    The irony? I wouldn't be allowed to adopt one of their cats, officially, because I have an intact male dog who will show.

    I never thought in a million years I'd own a purebred dog. I *get* the value of rescue. I *get* the need. What I will NEVER get is how many rescue people throw the baby out with the bath water.

    Breeding isn't the problem. Indiscriminate and/or careless breeding is.  Well bred dogs aren't the ones dying in shelters.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Dog_ma

    The irony? I wouldn't be allowed to adopt one of their cats, officially, because I have an intact male dog who will show.

    I never thought in a million years I'd own a purebred dog. I *get* the value of rescue. I *get* the need. What I will NEVER get is how many rescue people throw the baby out with the bath water.

    I would expect it to be a few rescues.  When I started fostering, Drizzle was intact and remained intact.  Some of my fosters come to me with Heartworm and that prevented them from being spay/neutered.  My rescue org never put requirements on me.  I am responsible.

    But for sure there are very obstinate people within rescue groups that may represent a situation different from it is.  I remember going to a rescue event and I took Blizzard.  Blizzard was wearing a 4 inch collar and there was a women pleading with me to take the collar off because it looked heavy.  She stalked me throughout the day.  I just thought she was a weirdo but she did create a controversy.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Pwca

    Maybe you LIKE being called things like "greeder" and told "it's YOUR fault that there are puppies dying in our shelter!"

    People seem to be born the pushy type.  Because I follow a proven fostering model and am able to keep some dogs for an extended stay here, I am accused of wasting a place that a more adoptable adopted dog could get but is PTS.  Yeah, like there is a "more adoptable" dog around.  Just what are you suppose to do with those type of people.

    • Gold Top Dog

    DPU

    People seem to be born the pushy type.  Because I follow a proven fostering model and am able to keep some dogs for an extended stay here, I am accused of wasting a place that a more adoptable adopted dog could get but is PTS.  Yeah, like there is a "more adoptable" dog around.  Just what are you suppose to do with those type of people.

    Thinly veiled. I know what that was about.

    Anyway. I don't think it's wrong to breed dogs, if done carefully and with lots of forethought. What would separate me in viewpoint from a strict adherence to AKC standards is that I think dogs should be bred for temperment, health, and workability, in that order. I care not a whit if the dog is an inch or half a pound over standard. Or if the ears are too long or too short. What's more important is that the dog is able to coexist with others. Even in a purebred litter gained after months of genetic investigation and lineage charts and health certs enough to paper a wall, only a few will be considered "show worthy" because they also happen to have the magic physical dimensions. JMO.

    But we have good people here who are breeders, though they don't breed often. Not enough to make money. They breed for the betterment of the breed. To produce the soundest Beagle or American Staffordshire possible. And as far as I can tell, their programs include my thoughts as well as conformation. A difficult task, indeed.

    As for other breeders, I can't do much about that. And I try not to judge another person because they want to breed. Someone tells me they want to breed, I know they won't listen to me if I get arrogant and start beating them over the head with words. What I do, instead, is try to relay the requirements I talk about as well as my own predilection towards getting pets at shelters or re-homes, or just plain rescuing off the street. And by nicely pointing out all the expenses of even just the casual breeding that some do, let alone legitimate breeding. A person allowing dogs to breed in their backyard is still going to incur some costs. The birthing and vet visits. Shots. More food. A way to house the dogs. What happens if they can't sell all the dogs, etc. All with "imagine that" and "from what I've seen" or "what I have read" or "what I know." If that other person has a brain watt going, they will listen to some of it. If not, then I was talking to a wall.

    So, I'm not meeting a lot of people that are against breeders or who consider breeders as adding to the problem. And there are times when the breeder is just fine. The human they sold to is the problem. Once again, I shall trot out another trusty story. I once saw a Shiba Inu at the Sherman Animal Shelter in our rural county. I cannot impress enough on you all how rare that dog would be around here. Yet there she was. She probably cost a grand or more as a pup. Only to wind up in a shelter. And I wouldn't assume her breeder had this life result in mind. And before someone says a breeder should follow up on everything, exactly where is the breeder going to scare up money for extensive investigation? They've already spent themselves in the red on the breeding and litter.

    But evidently others can pee away a grand like it was nothing. Must be nice.

    Part of the problem is the USDA, who first recommended farmers breed dogs as a supplement income when crops were down in the market or not growing. But there wasn't much guideline or direction as to what kind of ethics were required. One only had to pay a fee to get a USDA license and be a "licensed breeder." Now, if the person truly was a farmer or stockman, he or she probably raised good dogs, from previous experience breeding livestock. But now you've got people breeding who can't say "double recessive", alone spell it. Can I get an allele?