Dog Owners' Oprah Alert

    • Gold Top Dog

    Dog Owners' Oprah Alert

     

    Dog Owners’ Oprah Alert by JOHN YATES The American Sporting Dog Alliance http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org Dog owners might be in for another bashing on Friday, when ultra-liberal talk show host Oprah Winfrey does a special program on “puppy mills.” Winfrey’s star reporter, Lisa Ling, went undercover in commercial breeding kennels to do an expose on the pet store trade. Although the commercial trade in pet store puppies has nothing to do with the vast majority of dog owners and breeders, sensationalistic news coverage tars us with the same brush. To the liberal animal rights mindset, all breeders are either “puppy mills” or “backyard breeders,” and this always translates into more laws that harm only the innocent. Moreover, the hidden agenda of the animal rights movement is the ultimate elimination of animal ownership, and their strategy is to pick us off one group at a time. The American Sporting Dog Alliance (ASDA) does not know how Winfrey and Ling will approach the topic, but we are not optimistic that it will be a fair, balanced and reasonably objective report. Based on the normal biased reporting we see about dog breeding, and Winfrey’s close personal ties with animal rights groups, we would expect them to take their cameras into a couple of “worst case” kennels, and then by inference say or imply that all kennels and breeders are bad. Expect to take a thumping from one of the wealthiest and most powerful animal rights activists on Earth.

    According to a report in Women’s Day magazine, billionaire Winfrey feels that leaving a cool $30 million to her own five dogs in her will is not even slightly extravagant. Inflation, you know. Winfrey was partners with the radical Humane Society of the United States in a movement aimed at destroying cattle ranching because of alleged food safety issues from eating beef, and they were codefendants in a lawsuit brought by the industry. This month, Winfrey has been giving serious consideration to an invitation to appear in nude photographs sponsored by one of the most extreme animal rights groups in America, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, pop tabloids report. The nude photos would be for PETA’s “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” campaign. Winfrey’s concern reportedly is not about endorsing PETA. The tabloids report that she is worried that nude photos might offend voters and harm the presidential campaign of Barrack Obama, whom she has strongly endorsed.

    On Friday, we can expect a thumping with no opportunity to defend ourselves. The Winfrey/Ling style of journalism is to exploit highly emotional topics and sensationalize them to twang the heartstrings of a predominantly middle class audience of liberals who are looking for the next “do-gooder” cause to embrace. It looks like saving the whales or feeding starving people in Somalia aren’t fashionable this year. Pity the poor whales. Pity the poor Somali refugees. And pity the poor dog owners!

    A campaign against dog owners and breeders has become the latest fashionable cause for the glitz and glitter crowd of celebrities. The question is, what are we going to do about it? For myself, I’m just plain sick and tired of being unfairly bashed. I guess I just wasn’t raised to be a punching bag. But, you might be asking, how can we fight back against the wealthiest and most powerful media mogul in America? How can we fight that kind of power? How can we fight someone who wills $30 million to her dogs when we’re trying to figure out how to pay last month’s electric bill?

    I think we can do it, if we get off of our butts and actually do it. There are hundreds of thousands of people who breed dogs because they love them – show dogs, performing dogs, hunting dogs, obedience dogs, field trial dogs, companion dogs and just plain dogs. In addition, there are millions of dog owners who love their animals and thank breeders for doing the fine job that they know we do in improving temperament, genetic soundness, utility, beauty and health. If we join together in this, we can be a formidable force. My thoughts are that a boycott of Winfrey’s advertisers would be the most effective strategy. If several hundred thousand dog owners and breeders were to contact advertisers on the Oprah show and refuse to buy any of their products, they would be forced to take notice.

    Please understand that I am not talking about censoring Winfrey’s opinions. I would fight for her right to express any opinion she chooses, and also for her right to present and endorse the views of animal rights groups on her program. However, journalistic ethics demands fairness, balance and objectivity if programming purports to be reporting the news. If Oprah wants to do a report on dog breeding, that’s fine. But the report should be fair to us and give us the opportunity to balance the views of the animal rights groups with our side of the story. I don’t expect that Oprah will hold to the same standard of ethics that I did as a newspaper reporter. I expect that her report will be a hatchet job on dog owners and breeders.

    The promotional blog for Friday’s Oprah Show gives us an idea of what we can expect: http://www.oprah.com/community/thread/44908. Read it for yourself. A boycott of advertisers just might convince Oprah to undergo an ethical reformation. Most of her advertisers won’t like the idea of losing several hundred thousand customers so that Oprah can preach sermons against dog owners and breeders. When I worked on newspapers, there was a cynical wisecrack that my bosses sometimes told me when they didn’t like something I wrote. “There is freedom of the press in America – for anyone who owns a press.” That meant I didn’t own the press. It takes a lot of money to own a TV show. Oprah has that kind of money, and she earned it, but it has gone to her head. Now she sneers at the rights and lives of ordinary people who made her a pop star, and that includes dog owners and breeders. The Internet is the great equalizer. One of the beauties of the Internet is that it allows everyone to truly have the rights of free speech and free press. The Internet has become the printing press of ordinary people, and now it reaches a reported 80-percent of American households. Television represents the past, when Oprah’s kind of money and power controlled the right of a free press. The Internet has given us our voice.

    The American Sporting Dog Alliance is asking all dog owners and breeders to watch the Oprah Show on Friday and form your own opinions. Then, if she does the kind of hatchet job we expect, please bombard her with emails expressing your displeasure. Then, we need to get organized for a campaign to reach her advertisers. In order to get ready, ASDA is asking readers of this report to email us a list of every advertiser that supports the Oprah Show. ASDA is willing to organize this campaign. Also, please let us know if you are able to help with it. Our email address is asda@csonline.net. The American Sporting Dog Alliance works at the grassroots to defend the rights of dog owners and professionals against the very real threats of animal rights activism. Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. We maintain strict independence and are supported only by the voluntary donations of our members. While the Oprah segment may be about “puppy mills,” the laws that her friends in PETA and HSUS are proposing really are targeting dog owners and hobby breeders, with the goal of reducing and ultimately eliminating animal ownership. These same radical groups also want to eliminate hunting, ban the ownership of firearms, forcibly convert us to vegan vegetarianism and destroy American farming traditions. “Puppy mills” are not the issue. Existing federal, state and animal cruelty laws already intensively regulate commercial kennels. You are the issue. These groups want to destroy the things that you love and believe in. Does Oprah have a conscience? She is leaving $30 million to support five dogs that she loves and apparently believes she is doing something right by supporting animal rights groups. But she is being suckered. She is supporting groups that believe that the only unexploited dog is a dead dog. The truth is that PETA slaughters 97-percent of the dogs that enter the organization’s “shelter” in Virginia. They would rather kill those dogs than help them find a loving home. Please forward this posting to as many people as you can, and also cross-post it on message boards. We need to reach as many people as possible quickly.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Isn't this jumping the gun a bit?  The show hasn't aired yet, and we are already certain that it will be bad for ALL breeders?

    How many of us have actually written to Oprah asking that she do a piece on the horrible puppy mills?  I know that I have.  I welcome a look at the puppy mills and the babies that end up in pet stores only to sucker some poor potential parent that can't resist, and has NO idea what conditions that little one came from.  Hopefully, this will open a lot of eyes.

    I think I'll reserve judgment, and actions, until I actually see the show.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Mod note, 

    ER...I put in paragraph's to make this an easier read. I also made your link an active one. Just letting you know.

    • Gold Top Dog

    glenmar

    Isn't this jumping the gun a bit?  The show hasn't aired yet, and we are already certain that it will be bad for ALL breeders?

    How many of us have actually written to Oprah asking that she do a piece on the horrible puppy mills?  I know that I have.  I welcome a look at the puppy mills and the babies that end up in pet stores only to sucker some poor potential parent that can't resist, and has NO idea what conditions that little one came from.  Hopefully, this will open a lot of eyes.

    I think I'll reserve judgment, and actions, until I actually see the show.

    I agree. It hasn't even aired.

    • Gold Top Dog

     I must admit that I am a little put off by this "Alert" and I agree that it is definitely jumping the gun. You know everyone jumps up and down and wants something done about the puppy millers and we go round and round discussing how cruel and inhumane they all our and how we want them all jailed, shut down, tarred and feathered. RAH! RAH! Well of course that is only if our own self interests aren't in any way impacted.

    I am quite looking forward to this program. I think it is way over due. The public needs to be educated. They need to know under what circumstances their pet store puppy came to be. They have to see just how disgusting these places are. If bringing this to the attention of America means that reputable breeder come under more scrutiny and possible stricter regulations, I think that is a fair trade. As well as defining a reputable breeder by it's rescue work (as stated in another thread) we should also define them by their efforts to eliminate puppy mills.  

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    denise m
    They need to know under what circumstances their pet store puppy came to be.

    This is why the warning was published.  Already everyone makes the assumptions that all dogs in the pet store come from the the breeders that keep their dogs in substandard conditions.  Do you really think that this show will go to a USDA licensed breeder and show their facility or go to Hunt Corp to show their state of the art facility.  No because the perception is out that that anyone that supplies puppies to the pet store is a puppy miller.  This will be just like all the other slanted reports on pet stores and biased views on pet stores.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    I'm very much looking forward to the program too. I've already set my DVR for it.

    • Gold Top Dog

    timsdat

    This is why the warning was published.  Already everyone makes the assumptions that all dogs in the pet store come from the the breeders that keep their dogs in substandard conditions.  Do you really think that this show will go to a USDA licensed breeder and show their facility or go to Hunt Corp to show their state of the art facility.  No because the perception is out that that anyone that supplies puppies to the pet store is a puppy miller.  This will be just like all the other slanted reports on pet stores and biased views on pet stores.




    EXACTLY!

    I also have two other issues. Oprah is an animal rights activist, or at least, she keeps the ARs rolling in dough. We all know the AR agenda is to abolish pet ownership, and apparently, Oprah never got that memo. She's frequented commercial breeders (and GASP she has had white Goldens). It's hypocracy at best & also a touch of ingnorance. Does Oprah realize that animal rights groups go undercover at kenenls - these people are hired as kennel help and neglect their duties. They don't clean up pens, leave dogs ungroomed, etc, then take pics when the kennel run looks it's absolute worst. They are NOT showing the entire kennel in most instances, just a few dogs who were scrawny and not in the greatest condition to begin with, and taking that to an exaggerated point. Do you think those filthy dogs in wire cages they show are like that 24/7 ... or did someones undercover kennel employee let said dog frolic in the mud, not clean it's cage, then take pics?

    Secondly, this is only another in a long line of AR propoganda films. It's just another advertisement of the "breeders  breed misery - buy and a shelter dog dies" campaign. They have ingrained the word puppy mill in America's psyche. They've made breeding a bad word. They've managed to pass awful anti breeder, hunting laws that WILL essentially outlaw breeding if this trend continues over the next 10+ years. This is just another nail in the coffin of the right to breed and own pets ... problem is Oprah is too misguided to even realize it.

    • Gold Top Dog

    timsdat

    denise m
    They need to know under what circumstances their pet store puppy came to be.

    This is why the warning was published.  Already everyone makes the assumptions that all dogs in the pet store come from the the breeders that keep their dogs in substandard conditions.

    How about if we just aim for educating buyers to check into the background of the puppy they buy? If the puppy came from a reputable breeder, then great. I'd want to know that. If the puppy came from a puppy mill, then I'd want to know that too. I'm fairly certain that most people would still buy the puppy from a good breeder, but they might be less apt to do that if they realized it came from a puppy mill.

    • Gold Top Dog

    cakana
    If the puppy came from a puppy mill

    What is a puppy mill though?  From what I read people seem to feel that any dog in a pet store is from puppy mill and if you ask AR folks all breeders are greedy puppy millers.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    timsdat
    Already everyone makes the assumptions that all dogs in the pet store come from the the breeders that keep their dogs in substandard conditions. 

     

    There's much more to being a puppy mill than the conditions of the kennel. Even if the conditions are fantastic, if the right care isn't taken of the dogs and the proper medical tests aren't done, the place is a puppy mill.

    I actually am under the impression that puppies in pet stores are from puppy mills instead of good, ethical breeders. Is there something incorrect about this information?  I can't imagine why good breeders would put their puppies in pet stores to sell them... Unless it's for the money.

    timsdat
    Do you really think that this show will go to a USDA licensed breeder and show their facility or go to Hunt Corp to show their state of the art facility. 

     

    I really don't care that much about their facility. Show me their breeding practices, their breeding program and their medical tests. That's the criteria by which I'm going to make my judgment. Not JUST the facilities. Anyone can put a pretty covering on a rotten practice.

    timsdat
    This will be just like all the other slanted reports on pet stores and biased views on pet stores.

     

    If good, ethical breeders are overwhelmingly selling their puppies in pet stores, I would certainly like to see proof of that. Maybe I'm all turned around on this... Confused

    I'm put off by the warning, too. I'm not sure how Oprah can be charged with supporting the elimination of animal ownership when she has 5 dogs of her own... Too many assumptions are made in this warning to go into.

    • Gold Top Dog

    timsdat

    Already everyone makes the assumptions that all dogs in the pet store come from the the breeders that keep their dogs in substandard conditions.

    Gee, I thought everyone made the assumption that dogs in pet stores come from puppy mills, substandard conditions not withstanding. I've been preached at for years on this forum not to buy from a pet store. I have been told that it would be supporting puppy mills. Are you telling me that I should reconsider that position? 

    cakana

    How about if we just aim for educating buyers to check into the background of the puppy they buy? If the puppy came from a reputable breeder, then great.

     

    See now I'm really confused. Are there not hundreds of posts on this forum that specifically state "Reputable Breeders Do Not Sell to Pet Stores"? Am I missing something?

     


    • Gold Top Dog

    FourIsCompany
    the place is a puppy mill.

    Sounds to me that if they don't meet you exact specifications they are a puppy mill.  I wonder what percentage of breeders you would consider puppy mills. 

    • Gold Top Dog

    denise m
    See now I'm really confused. Are there not hundreds of posts on this forum that specifically state "Reputable Breeders Do Not Sell to Pet Stores"? Am I missing something?

    That is the problem.  All these terms don't have standard definitions.  One persons puppy mill is anothers reputable breeder.  If you listen to AR types ALL breeders are puppy millers.

    Tell you what.  How many puppies would be born each year if all commercial breeding was stopped, all incidental mixed breeding was eliminated, all breeder that made a profit on there litters were eliminated, all breeders that don't fall into the strictest guidelines of being a "responsible breeder" were forbidden from breeding.  Well I can tell you they there would be very few puppies left and you could probably not afford them.

     

    • Gold Top Dog

    eaglerock814
    Winfrey was partners with the radical Humane Society of the United States in a movement aimed at destroying cattle ranching

     

    I am unaware of this. Can you provide a source?

    eaglerock814
    This month, Winfrey has been giving serious consideration to an invitation to appear in nude photographs sponsored by one of the most extreme animal rights groups in America, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, pop tabloids report. The nude photos would be for PETA’s “I’d Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur” campaign.

     

    And could you provide a credible source for this assertion? I cannot find anything to back up this claim of yours... Here's what "Popcrunch Celebrity Tabloid" has to say...

    Spies for the Globe claim Oprah is worried that turning down the chance to pose for PETA will adversly affect her public image.

    So perhaps she was asked, but do we really know that she even considered it?  Much less "seriously considered" it?

    Nothing quoting her at all. In fact, according to contactmusic.com,

    Talk show host OPRAH WINFREY has decided on a novel way to mark her approaching 50th birthday - posing for nude pictures. [...]  But fans of Oprah will not be treated to a peek of the snaps she's doing them solely for her longtime love STEDMAN GRAHAM.

    I'd like to see some sources for the allegations you make in your warning.

    Thanks for the warning, by the way. I will watch the show and decide for myself.