dgriego
Posted : 3/9/2008 9:39:44 PM
ottoluv
It depends on what you think neglegence is.
are you saying that the death of the dog is due to negligence?
DrOgreys
Perhaps we should reserve "risky sport" to those who willingly choose to participate, rather than those who are forced to... please don't argue the "they are bred for..." aspect. I am fervently involved in the quest to eliminate greyhound racing. I have argued with the best of them.
Sorry but I do not think comparing this to greyhound racing even comes close. Greyhound racing is non dog people, using an animal for the purpose of greed and gambeling, similar to dog fighting. The owner or trainer has no repore with the dogs, they are tools.
Musher's and hunters have a relationship with their dogs, each is risking themselves and there exists commraderie. Yes there are bad mushers and bad hunters but neither can be compared to greyhound racing or dog fighting. It is a different type of person.
As for the musher who owns this dog
"Rookie musher John Stetson of Duluth, Minn., scratched Saturday in Cripple following the early morning death of a 7-year-old male dog on his team. Stetson, who was 61st in the standings, cited the death of Zaster as well as concerns over sick dogs as his reasons for scratching."
This does not sound like the actions of one who is in the race for greed. How many greyhound owners and trainers quit because one of their dogs die? None. IMO it is an insult to compare this type of racing to the racing of greyhound.