huskymom
Posted : 4/10/2007 9:22:45 PM
I believe ALL dogs ought to be altered, unless they are proven in the show ring to reproduce.
But how can they be proven in the show ring if they are altered before they are allowed to enter it?
Again I point out the fact that irresponsible breeders will not be dissuaded from breeding. They'll just skip vaccines and other important vet care in order not to have their dogs on records of any type. Licensing won't be done. Forget chipping or anything like that. I just don't see how this can possibly do any good. The oops litters, I would wager to say aren't the big picture here. People that want to breed thier dogs are going to do it regardless.
I think that lowering the cost of a spay/neuter should be the first step. If it could be made completely free, that would go a long long way towards cutting the unwanted pet population down. However I know that probably isn't feesable since alot of taxpayers would not want to pay for someone elses dog to be fixed.
Raise the age line to 1 year. Then the age argument of whether it is safe or not would be void. It would also give purebred dogs a chance to compete. Even say if you spay or neuter you pet before it is 4 months, you save half the cost or whatever. But mandatory after 1 year.
I will never support a bill anywhere where the ultimate goal is to wipe out the companion animal population. I love my dogs and I would never want to live without one. Or 2 or 3 or 4 or....[
]
Cockapoosheida, Please don't breed you dog just because your family wants her puppies. There are way too many dogs out there that need homes. This is how I think about it. If I bred Crusher, and his mate had 8 puppies, even if those puppies found great homes, then 8 puppies would die in shelters because Crusher's puppies would take thier rightful spots. I couldn't live with that. Could you? And btw, the bill has not been passed yet as far as I know. Its still in the works.