ron2
Posted : 1/28/2008 10:12:12 PM
BCMixs
Those are some of the stiffest punishments in the country. Most places have very light fines, if anything is done at all, and they can still own animals, etc
Good point. At the Sherman Animal Shelter is a 9 year old female lab. As a puppy, her owner poured gasoline on her and set her on fire. The state has decreed that she will live out her life in that shelter and she cannot be adopted out. She is HA in general and HA specifically towards people of darker skin color than white. The original offender had dark skin color. And the shelter cannot refuse adoption on the basis of skin color. Anyway, the suspect got a couple of hundred dollars fine and a 6 month probated sentence. No jail time.
I agree with Bullymom that a fine should be levied, even jail time, and the suspect should be banned from owning pets. That would make future ownership of pets a contempt of court, for which you do go to jail.
I also understand Gina's point. Just the same, I would have lots of stress if I were an ACO. Even as I could rescue the animal the temptation would be strong to wreak unholy vengeance upon the suspect.
My favorite author, Heinlein, was a cat lover. He once quipped, "There is a special hell for those who abandon cats." Well, I would like to extend that hell to those that abuse any animal. Even if they don't receive retribution in this life, they will in the next.