Intrusive Rabies Law in VA

    • Gold Top Dog

    Intrusive Rabies Law in VA

    Cross post as desired...scary stuff!!
    ====================================================================
     
    "Forwarding to friends and family in Virginia recommended -  Sorry, =
    Virginia - this is not such great news . . .  .   forwarding encouraged =
    . .. . .=20

    Subject: Virginia's New Rabies Dog Licensing Database - Update & =
    Recommendations


    Dear Virginia Dog Owners,


    This message briefly describes Virginia's new statewide "Gotcha" dog =
    licensing database, which will be started July 1, 2007, and suggests =
    some ways in which dog owners may ensure their animals' health while =
    also protecting their personal privacy. You are encouraged to share this =
    advice with other pet owners.


    Delegate Bobby Orrock's (R-Spotsylvania) HB339 "Gotcha" licensing =
    database, passed in 2005, contained a delayed effective date. Beginning =
    on July 1, 2007, Virginia veterinarians will furnish city and county =
    treasurers detailed information about every animal receiving a rabies =
    vaccination. On and after January 1, 2008, treasurers will use this data =
    to prepare and mail annual dog tax (licensing) bills, just as they do =
    realty and personal property tax bills. See the attached instructions to =
    veterinarians prepared by the Virginia Treasurers Association and the =
    Virginia Veterinary Medical Association (VVMA). HB339 passed the General =
    Assembly by a single vote. It was strongly supported by the Virginia =
    Animal Control Association (VACA), VVMA, and with significant assistance =
    from the Humane Society of the US (HSUS) and the Virginia Federation of =
    Dog Clubs and Breeders (VFDCB).=20


    The primary goal of this legislation is to increase licensing costs =
    while providing an enforcement database system to monitor and encourage =
    pet sterilizations and breeder permitting. For a detailed record of this =
    measure's passage into law, see =


    http://vhdoa.uplandbirddog.com/VETO_HB339.html Early indications are =
    that the cost of a rabies vaccination will shortly rise $10-15 to =
    compensate veterinarians for their extra paperwork. Counties and cities =
    are expected to recoup their added accounting and personnel costs by =
    raising tag costs next fiscal year. The secondary HB339 goal is to =
    gather private dog owner information in an electronic format for use by =
    government agencies, insurance companies, other commercial entities, =
    animal rights zealots and private individuals seeking such data under =
    the Freedom of Information Act, if necessary. The names of owners of =
    certain breeds, sorted by zip code will be accessible, as will =
    information on the owners of intact dogs, owners of more than X animals, =
    etc. City and county dog rabies and personal data records are expected =
    to be consolidated in Richmond by the end of 2008. This is the first =
    such statewide dog owner database in the nation. Efforts to amend the =
    "Gotcha" system to protect your privacy during the last General Assembly =
    session failed. Exposure of 100,000 concealed weapon carry permit =
    holders' names caused an immediate change in State Police procedures =
    this year. The public release of detailed private information on one =
    million Virginia dog owning households should generate some political =
    reaction, but it hasn't.


    As frightening and dangerous as this invasion of your privacy is, you =
    must get your dogs vaccinated against rabies. There is a rabies epidemic =
    raging in Virginia. Don't take any chances with this killer virus. Last =
    year four Americans died from rabies and 1074 Virginians were treated =
    for exposure. [linkhttp://vhdoa.uplandbirddog.com/VA_RabiesData.html]http://vhdoa.uplandbirddog.com/VA_RabiesData.html[/link] If you =
    wish to remain outside of the rabies-licensing regime, there are several =


    ways that you may protect your dogs' health and also safeguard your =
    privacy.


    a) Obtain your rabies vaccinations out-of-state. Other states' DVMs =
    won't violate your privacy.


    b) Obtain vaccinations before 7/1/2007. At least in principle, records =
    before 7/1/2007 are private, if your veterinarian understands the law =
    and respects his professional-client relationship. Adult rabies =
    vaccinations are effective for at least five years, if not for a =
    lifetime. Northern Virginia residents: Fairfax County's $10 rabies =
    clinic will be held at the 4500 West Ox Road Animal Shelter on May 20, =
    2007 from noon - 2 pm.


    c) After 7/1/2007, obtain rabies vaccinations at a clinic where you =
    aren't known, pay cash and don't supply your correct address.


    d) After 7/1/2007, offer to pay your veterinarian's $10 fine, if he/she =
    will respect your privacy and not transmit your dog's records to =
    treasurers. In the unlikely event veterinary client records are ever =
    audited, the new code section provides for civil penalty not to exceed =
    $10 per certificate for a veterinarian that willfully fails to provide =
    treasurers with rabies certificates. If your veterinarian raises charges =
    for forwarding such certificates, ask he/she to put your extra fee in =
    the bank for possible fine payment and not release your information.=20


    This mechanism has been suggested by several Virginia veterinarians. =
    VVMA represents only a portion of the licensed DVM personnel in the =
    state and nearly all of its members were kept in the dark about HB339, =
    while its lobbyists negotiated out of the bill's initial requirement =
    that veterinarians sell dog tags. The result is the new "Gotcha" system. =
    Instead of providing that convenient service, Virginia's veterinary =
    professionals have become assistant animal control officers. Many of =
    them deeply resent that role. Perhaps yours feels that way as well.




    e) Virginians may legally self-vaccinate their animals against rabies =
    using mail order vaccine. Such vaccines are inexpensive, safe and =
    effective. The drawback to self-vaccinating is that should your dog ever =
    bite someone or something, an animal control officer may want to see a =
    veterinarian's vaccination certificate. A rabies titer might be used as =
    proof of vaccination, but that alternative  may not be accepted. The =
    failure to produce a signed certificate could mean your animal is =
    quarantined for an extended period or perhaps euthansized.


    Pet Data, a private Texas animal licensing contractor and HSUS =
    supporter, is gathering dog owner data one city and county at a time. =
    [linkhttp://www.petdata.com/company/about/about.html]http://www.petdata.com/company/about/about.html[/link] The firm has no privacy =
    policy, like Virginia. Given Albuquerque's new $125 intact fee and the =
    pending California mandatory pet castration-spay law, animal owners =
    would be wise to avoid such databases, including ours.
    • Gold Top Dog
    While I realize that at it's worst this is an invasion of privacy for pet owners, at it's best scofflaws that do not register their dogs, those who participate in dog fighting, and those who routinely abandon their dogs at the end of deer season will be a part of this database.
    • Gold Top Dog
    So will ALL pb owners...likely in prep. for BSL.
    • Gold Top Dog
    I'm not so sure how I feel about this... one of the big arguments against CA's spay/neuter bill was that AC isn't sufficiently enforcing the laws it has currently, like registrations. While I'm not a huge fan of people collecting my information, isn't this a step in the right direction towards forcing people to obey the laws that current exist?

    Though then again, it might discourage rabies shots, which would be far worse than unregistered dogs...
    • Gold Top Dog
    All the county needs is whether or not the dog or cat rec'd the vaccin. What exactly is the "detailed info" that is also being gathered about the animal? spay neutered? breed?...and to what purpose? therein is the issue IMO.
    • Gold Top Dog
    I would have a huge problem with that type of law being applied to cats.  I'm not sure how true this is for dogs, but rabies vaccs are often the cause of some cancerous sarcomas in cats.  My middle cat (see black and white one in sig) developed a hard lump after her most recent rabies vaccn.  It lasted for several months before it dissipated.  The vet recommended she no longer receive a rabies vaccn and we agreed that she will not, since all of my other animals will continue their vaccs and she is an indoor cat so there's really no other way she could get rabies.  Why would I want to put her life at risk AND have to pay MORE money?

    Also, I think this is a big privacy issue and as BSL becomes more popular, it's totally unfair for PB owners to blindside them like this.
    • Gold Top Dog
    I would go out of state to vaccinate my dogs if I needed to. I don't register them now, and won't ever ESPECIALLY in a situation where they would be collecting data such as my dog's breeds and whether they were spayed or neutered. No freaking way. I'd vaccinate them at home myself if I had to. 
     
    And barring that? I wouldn't vaccinate them. Say what you want, but I'm not giving anyone, ever, ANY info that could come back to bite me in the event of BSL being enacted. I'd rather take my chances with having unvaccinated dogs then give people who have the ability to have my dogs taken away and killed that kind of information.