Ethical question for rescuers

    • Gold Top Dog

    Ethical question for rescuers

    Perhaps you can help me. I am thinking of donating a portion of my puppy sales from basically here on out...to a rescue org. Now my question is this, would you all as rescuers...find this in bad taste? I mean obviously these folks "bought" a puppy...instead of rescuing a dog...and part of the proceeds of that would be what I'd be giving. I just am not sure if that is okay....or not?
     
    It'd be written into the contract what the amount would be, and what group it was going to...and be donated in the puppy they purchase's "name". I'd also be interested in possibly putting this on my site, along with the link to the org itself, more so other Beaglers (who are always poking around each others sites) might view it and think "hey I can do that too"....plenty do help rescue, but not everyone can foster or donate money all year round. When placing puppies sounds like the ideal timeframe tho?
     
    I would love some input pro or con....so I can really get a handle on the idea and make a judgement...thanks!
    • Gold Top Dog
    rwbeagles, I don't understand why would that be in a bad taste. I maybe not understanding your're trying to do: you will be donating money that people will give you for your pups, right? It's none of everybody else's business what you do with your money. Plain and simple. Especially for a cause like that ... I'd be 100% confident it's in your taste - good taste. [;)]
    • Gold Top Dog
    No in bad taste at all but there are rescues out there that would stand on their soapbox and not accept the money based on 'principle' - not that I agree but I have run into a few people who are anti-breeding no matter what.  Being that you breed beagles maybe tie it into your national rescue club?  Can't see where they would object and that way it stays in the family so to speak. 
    • Gold Top Dog
    My rescue might not approve of Attila the Hun, but if he wants to fork over some cash for the cause, we'll gladly take it.
     
    Hmmmm, I didn't mean that to sound like I equate breeders with bad people, because I don't. But, hopefully you get what I mean?
    • Gold Top Dog
    I actually think it's quite a responsible thing to do and if other breeders get the idea the more the better!
    • Gold Top Dog
    Rredbird it's s breed specific rescue...but one I chose because I like the people working in it and I've helped them out before fas networking, and it's semi local/regional etc.
     
    Thank you guys for the input! I may have been overthinking but it's better to bounce idea off folks first I always say [:)]
    • Gold Top Dog
    In my opinion,NO donation to a rescue is ever in bad taste!!
    • Gold Top Dog
    rredbird has a point, you might not like to hear what some of them have to say.
    You can always donate anonymously, that way you feel good about what you did, and animals benefit from it.
     
    I have donated anonymously,and just knowing I helped made all the difference.
    • Gold Top Dog
    ...but one I chose because I like the people working in it and I've helped them out before fas networking, and it's semi local/regional etc.

     
    If you already have a working relationship with them I can not see where they would have any onjections to your idea and would more than likely kiss you[sm=kiss.gif] for suggesting it! 
    • Gold Top Dog
    IMO, all breeders are adding to the overpopulation.  That's not to say I disagree with breeding because I don't and have a lot of respect and admiration for those who do it properly.  I have even MORE respect for them if they recognise that they are adding to the overpopulation of dogs and therefore do something to offset that - by fostering, volunteering, donating to rescues etc. etc.    In other words, not only do I think it's in GOOD taste for you to do it, I think you SHOULD do it!  That's just my opinion......
    • Gold Top Dog
    In the belgian community many breeders donate the cost of one puppy to rescue (breed club organization).  It is sort of like a gold standard of behavior.
    • Gold Top Dog
    IMO, all breeders are adding to the overpopulation. That's not to say I disagree with breeding because I don't and have a lot of respect and admiration for those who do it properly. I have even MORE respect for them if they recognise that they are adding to the overpopulation of dogs and therefore do something to offset that - by fostering, volunteering, donating to rescues etc. etc. In other words, not only do I think it's in GOOD taste for you to do it, I think you SHOULD do it! That's just my opinion......

     
    Ditto... I feel the exact same way.
    If you have a good relationship with this rescue then I think you should not even hesitate.
    • Gold Top Dog
    In my opinion I think it should be done anonymously.  If you wish to advertise your good deed and spread the news to other Beaglers, then I think the intent should be to sway the puppy buyer to go and adopt a rescue.  You also need to make the purchaser aware that there is no tax benefit and most likely, no tax benefit to you unless you make a profit on the transaction...reality.  There are intangibles in play here that will get you Goodwill, and that has a value.  You need to seriously think of the advantages you are receiving in comparison to what you are giving up and then equalize with a higher donation.  As I write this I am concluding that it is in bad taste.
    • Gold Top Dog
    That sounds like a wonderful idea.  It's sort of a "I added another dog into this world, here's the money to save a homeless one."  If the rescue you have in mind doesn't want it, I know a few Beagle rescues that could use the funds.
    • Gold Top Dog
    Nope, not at all. I have had this conversation with other rescuers in my area. We do not mind reputable breeders.
     
    Not only do they breed for quality but they also search (As I have seen with Dalmatians) shelters to see if one of "their" dogs could be in the shelter. If they are (which I have seen it happen quite a few times now), the breeder takes the dog back and either finds it a home or the dog spends the rest of it's life with the breeder.
     
    The national contact for dalmatian rescue is also a breeder herself. She only breeds once every 3 years, and spends most of her time rescuing dals.
     
    So no I dont think it is in poor taste. Some rescues might have a problem with it, but I say if they do find another one.
     
    Responsible breeders dont contribute to the problem and any rescuer with their head on straight realizes that.