samshine
Posted : 7/27/2007 8:42:28 PM
Hunter and prey has been a part of nature as long as there have been animals. It is the way of life, as natural as breathing. In many animals it is programmed right into their DNA. A cat does not need to be taught to hunt, and a deer does not need to be taught to flee. So I can understand the primordial thrill in watching this struggle take place. I'm not a hunter and have no wish to be, but when I see a wild animal hunting on nature TV programming, I am fascinated. It is life and death, as raw as it gets. And there is a certain rightness to it.
The sport of dog fighting is an abomination of nature. Dog are not naturally vicious. In nature, they would sometimes fight over status, territory, food, etc. Very rarely to the death. And they would never fight for no reason. So the very nature of these dogs has been perverted through selective breeding. Breeding dogs who are that dog aggressive is like purposely creating a form of mental illness. Those dogs need to be muzzled and physically restrained to even breed. The puppies need to be separated at a fairly young age so they don't kill each other. Then humans further pervert the nature of dogs by teaching them to be even more vicious.
So to me that is what separates dog fighting from things like hunting. One is nature, and the other is a perversion.
And then there is the added dimension of putting on a show just for human entertainment. Hunting in the wild is just about the prey and the hunter and the struggle for life. If there was an animal version of canned hunts, where a hunt was staged between natural predator and prey species but specifically for the entertainment of humans, well that would just leave a bad taste in my mouth. It's toying with life for amusement, not respect of life. So even if you weren't breeding dogs and training them for aggression, just had two family pets who would fight, setting them up and watching them fight is wrong.